Font Bakery Logo image/svg+xml Font Bakery Logo Robert Martinez font build service https://github.com/xen/fontbakery
Fontspector Technical Report

If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontspector/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.

Summary

๐Ÿ”ฅ FAILโš ๏ธ WARNโ„น๏ธ INFOโœ… PASSโฉ SKIP
38 88 78 1062 596
2% 5% 4% 59% 33%

Meaning of check results:

If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.

(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)

Fontspector version: 1.5.2

Opentype Specification Checks

Verify that family names in the name table are consistent across all fonts in the family. Checks Typographic Family name (nameID 16) if present, otherwise uses Font Family name (nameID 1)

Check ID: opentype/family/consistent_family_name
๐Ÿ”ฅ ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    12 different family names were found:

    • 'Matrix Sans Video' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Screen' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Screen SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Print' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Print SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Video SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSans-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Smooth SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Raster' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Smooth' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf)
    • 'Matrix Sans Raster SC' (found in fonts fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf)
    [code: inconsistent-family-name]

Fonts have consistent underline thickness?

Check ID: opentype/family/underline_thickness
๐Ÿ”ฅ ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Underline thickness is inconsistent. Detected underline thickness values are:

    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf: 100
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf: 100
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf: 80
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf: 100
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf: 86
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf: 86
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf: 80
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSans-Regular.ttf: 100
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf: 80
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf: 80
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf: 100
    • fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf: 100
    [code: inconsistent-underline-thickness]

Universal Profile Checks

Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

Check ID: contour_count
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 2, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 3, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 2, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 3, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • one (U+0031): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 8, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 8, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 9, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 7, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 9, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 7, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 10, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 7, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 7, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 2, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 15, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 8, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 7, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 12, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 10, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 10, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 9, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 8, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 9, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 11, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 12, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 9, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 17, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 14, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 9, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 11, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 13, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 13, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 14, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 14, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 14, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 8, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 9, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 4, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 9, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 9, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 16, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 9, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 13, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 8, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 18, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 8, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 13, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 9, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 7, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 11, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 4, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 11, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 11, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 11, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 10, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 6, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 6, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 8, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 8, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 6, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 10, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 13, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 14, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 8, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 13, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 11, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 13, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 11, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 13, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 11, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 7, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 13, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 13, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 13, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 13, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 15, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 12, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 12, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 16, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 12, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 14, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 12, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 14, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 7, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 7, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 7, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 10, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 6, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 4, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 16, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 2, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • hyphen (U+002D): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • one (U+0031): found 10, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 17, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 11, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • equal (U+003D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 13, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 15, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • underscore (U+005F): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 12, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • macron (U+00AF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • degree (U+00B0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 17, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 16, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • idieresis (U+00EF): found 10, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 14, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 19, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • imacron (U+012B): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 12, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 15, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 21, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 18, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 16, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 16, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 19, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 19, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 17, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 15, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 16, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 16, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 22, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C9 (U+02C9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CD (U+02CD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • uni02D7 (U+02D7): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0304 (U+0304): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0331 (U+0331): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0332 (U+0332): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0335 (U+0335): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Xi (U+039E): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 15, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 15, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 20, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 19, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 18, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0455 (U+0455): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 24, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 19, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 20, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 21, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 21, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 17, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 19, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 17, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 17, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 17, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 22, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 17, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 17, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA1 (U+1EA1): found 15, expected one of: {3, 7, 2}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 19, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 17, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 19, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 21, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 19, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 21, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 22, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 25, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 22, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 15, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 20, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 23, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 17, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 17, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 18, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 21, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 21, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 21, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 20, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 16, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 18, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 22, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2010 (U+2010): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2011 (U+2011): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • figuredash (U+2012): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • endash (U+2013): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • emdash (U+2014): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2015 (U+2015): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 11, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 13, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207B (U+207B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni207C (U+207C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208B (U+208B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208C (U+208C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 23, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 29, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 16, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 21, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • minus (U+2212): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • notequal (U+2260): found 15, expected one of: {7, 1, 3}
    • lessequal (U+2264): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • greaterequal (U+2265): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 30, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 42, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 24, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 25, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 37, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 25, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 34, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FE (U+A4FE): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FF (U+A4FF): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 22, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • eight.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 7, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • xi.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • hyphen (U+002D): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • one (U+0031): found 10, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 17, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 11, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • equal (U+003D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 13, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 15, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • underscore (U+005F): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 12, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • macron (U+00AF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • degree (U+00B0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 17, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 16, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • idieresis (U+00EF): found 10, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 14, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 19, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • imacron (U+012B): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 12, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 15, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 21, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 18, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 16, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 16, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 19, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 19, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 17, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 15, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 16, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 16, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 22, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C9 (U+02C9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CD (U+02CD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • uni02D7 (U+02D7): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0304 (U+0304): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0331 (U+0331): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0332 (U+0332): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0335 (U+0335): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Xi (U+039E): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 15, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 15, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 20, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 19, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 18, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0455 (U+0455): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 24, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 19, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 20, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 21, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 21, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 17, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 19, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 17, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 17, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 17, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 22, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 17, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 17, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA1 (U+1EA1): found 15, expected one of: {3, 7, 2}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 19, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 17, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 19, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 21, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 19, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 21, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 22, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 25, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 22, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 15, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 20, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 23, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 17, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 17, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 18, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 21, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 21, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 21, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 20, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 16, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 18, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 22, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2010 (U+2010): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2011 (U+2011): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • figuredash (U+2012): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • endash (U+2013): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • emdash (U+2014): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2015 (U+2015): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 11, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 13, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207B (U+207B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni207C (U+207C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208B (U+208B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208C (U+208C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 23, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 29, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 16, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 21, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • minus (U+2212): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • notequal (U+2260): found 15, expected one of: {7, 1, 3}
    • lessequal (U+2264): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • greaterequal (U+2265): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 30, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 42, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 24, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 25, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 37, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 25, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 34, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FE (U+A4FE): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FF (U+A4FF): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 22, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • eight.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 7, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • xi.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • hyphen (U+002D): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • one (U+0031): found 10, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 17, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 11, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • equal (U+003D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 13, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 15, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • underscore (U+005F): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 12, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • macron (U+00AF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • degree (U+00B0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 17, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 16, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • idieresis (U+00EF): found 10, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 14, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 19, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • imacron (U+012B): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 12, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 15, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 21, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 18, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 16, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 16, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 19, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 19, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 17, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 15, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 16, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 16, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 22, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C9 (U+02C9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CD (U+02CD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • uni02D7 (U+02D7): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0304 (U+0304): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0331 (U+0331): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0332 (U+0332): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0335 (U+0335): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Xi (U+039E): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 15, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 15, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 20, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 19, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 18, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0455 (U+0455): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 24, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 19, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 20, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 21, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 21, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 17, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 19, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 17, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 17, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 17, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 22, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 17, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 17, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA1 (U+1EA1): found 15, expected one of: {3, 7, 2}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 19, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 17, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 19, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 21, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 19, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 21, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 22, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 25, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 22, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 15, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 20, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 23, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 17, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 17, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 18, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 21, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 21, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 21, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 20, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 16, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 18, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 22, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2010 (U+2010): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2011 (U+2011): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • figuredash (U+2012): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • endash (U+2013): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • emdash (U+2014): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2015 (U+2015): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 11, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 13, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207B (U+207B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni207C (U+207C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208B (U+208B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208C (U+208C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 23, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 29, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 16, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 21, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • minus (U+2212): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • notequal (U+2260): found 15, expected one of: {7, 1, 3}
    • lessequal (U+2264): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • greaterequal (U+2265): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 30, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 42, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 24, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 25, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 37, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 25, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 34, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FE (U+A4FE): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FF (U+A4FF): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 22, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • eight.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 7, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • xi.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 2, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • one (U+0031): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 8, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 8, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 9, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 7, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 9, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 7, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 10, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 7, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 7, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 2, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 15, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 8, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 7, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 12, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 10, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 10, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 9, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 9, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 8, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 9, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 11, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 12, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 9, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 17, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 14, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 9, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 11, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 13, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 13, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 14, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 14, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 14, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 8, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 9, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 4, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 9, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 9, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 16, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 9, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 13, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 8, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 18, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 8, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 13, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 9, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 7, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 11, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 4, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 11, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 11, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 11, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 10, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 6, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 6, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 8, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 8, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 6, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 8, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 10, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 13, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 14, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 8, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 13, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 11, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 13, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 11, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 13, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 11, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 9, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 7, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 8, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 13, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 9, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 13, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 13, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 13, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 15, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 12, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 12, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 16, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 12, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 12, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 11, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 14, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 12, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 14, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 7, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 7, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 7, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 10, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 6, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 4, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 7, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 16, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 7, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • numbersign (U+0023): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2, 6}
    • quotesingle (U+0027): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • parenleft (U+0028): found 7, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • parenright (U+0029): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • plus (U+002B): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • comma (U+002C): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • hyphen (U+002D): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • one (U+0031): found 10, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • two (U+0032): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • three (U+0033): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • five (U+0035): found 17, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • six (U+0036): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • seven (U+0037): found 11, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • nine (U+0039): found 15, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • semicolon (U+003B): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • less (U+003C): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • equal (U+003D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • greater (U+003E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • question (U+003F): found 10, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • C (U+0043): found 13, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • I (U+0049): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • J (U+004A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • S (U+0053): found 15, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • U (U+0055): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • V (U+0056): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • bracketleft (U+005B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 5, 1}
    • bracketright (U+005D): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • asciicircum (U+005E): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • underscore (U+005F): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • grave (U+0060): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • c (U+0063): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • e (U+0065): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • l (U+006C): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2, 6}
    • n (U+006E): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • r (U+0072): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • s (U+0073): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • t (U+0074): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • u (U+0075): found 12, expected one of: {5, 1, 2}
    • v (U+0076): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • z (U+007A): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • braceleft (U+007B): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • bar (U+007C): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • braceright (U+007D): found 10, expected one of: {2, 5, 1}
    • asciitilde (U+007E): found 7, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • cent (U+00A2): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • currency (U+00A4): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • brokenbar (U+00A6): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • section (U+00A7): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • logicalnot (U+00AC): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • macron (U+00AF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • degree (U+00B0): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • plusminus (U+00B1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni00B2 (U+00B2): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni00B3 (U+00B3): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • acute (U+00B4): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • mu (U+00B5): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • cedilla (U+00B8): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni00B9 (U+00B9): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • questiondown (U+00BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Igrave (U+00CC): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • Iacute (U+00CD): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • multiply (U+00D7): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Ugrave (U+00D9): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • Uacute (U+00DA): found 17, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • germandbls (U+00DF): found 16, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • ccedilla (U+00E7): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 1}
    • egrave (U+00E8): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • eacute (U+00E9): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ecircumflex (U+00EA): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • edieresis (U+00EB): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • igrave (U+00EC): found 10, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • iacute (U+00ED): found 10, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • icircumflex (U+00EE): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • idieresis (U+00EF): found 10, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • ntilde (U+00F1): found 18, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ocircumflex (U+00F4): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • otilde (U+00F5): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • odieresis (U+00F6): found 14, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • ugrave (U+00F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uacute (U+00FA): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ucircumflex (U+00FB): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • udieresis (U+00FC): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • yacute (U+00FD): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Cacute (U+0106): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cacute (U+0107): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Ccircumflex (U+0108): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • ccircumflex (U+0109): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Cdotaccent (U+010A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • cdotaccent (U+010B): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Ccaron (U+010C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ccaron (U+010D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • emacron (U+0113): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ebreve (U+0115): found 19, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • edotaccent (U+0117): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • ecaron (U+011B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Itilde (U+0128): found 17, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • itilde (U+0129): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Imacron (U+012A): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • imacron (U+012B): found 11, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • Ibreve (U+012C): found 16, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ibreve (U+012D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • Idotaccent (U+0130): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • dotlessi (U+0131): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • Jcircumflex (U+0134): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • jcircumflex (U+0135): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • kgreenlandic (U+0138): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • lacute (U+013A): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • lcaron (U+013E): found 12, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • ldot (U+0140): found 11, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • nacute (U+0144): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • napostrophe (U+0149): found 15, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • omacron (U+014D): found 15, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • obreve (U+014F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • ohungarumlaut (U+0151): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • racute (U+0155): found 11, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • rcaron (U+0159): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • Sacute (U+015A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • sacute (U+015B): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • scircumflex (U+015D): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • tcaron (U+0165): found 14, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • Utilde (U+0168): found 21, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • utilde (U+0169): found 18, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Umacron (U+016A): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • umacron (U+016B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • Ubreve (U+016C): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • ubreve (U+016D): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uring (U+016F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • Uhungarumlaut (U+0170): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut (U+0171): found 16, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • Zacute (U+0179): found 17, expected one of: {2, 6, 4}
    • Zdotaccent (U+017B): found 16, expected one of: {6, 2, 4}
    • longs (U+017F): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0186 (U+0186): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni018A (U+018A): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni018F (U+018F): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0190 (U+0190): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0191 (U+0191): found 16, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • florin (U+0192): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0194 (U+0194): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0196 (U+0196): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0197 (U+0197): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0198 (U+0198): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni019A (U+019A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni019B (U+019B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni019D (U+019D): found 19, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni019F (U+019F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • Ohorn (U+01A0): found 19, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • ohorn (U+01A1): found 15, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni01B1 (U+01B1): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni01B3 (U+01B3): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01B4 (U+01B4): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni01B7 (U+01B7): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni01C2 (U+01C2): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni01CF (U+01CF): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D0 (U+01D0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni01D2 (U+01D2): found 15, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni01D3 (U+01D3): found 18, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni01D4 (U+01D4): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni01D6 (U+01D6): found 17, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni01D7 (U+01D7): found 15, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni01D8 (U+01D8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 5, 8}
    • uni01D9 (U+01D9): found 16, expected one of: {8, 5, 4}
    • uni01DC (U+01DC): found 16, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni01E4 (U+01E4): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Gcaron (U+01E6): found 20, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni01E8 (U+01E8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01E9 (U+01E9): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni01EA (U+01EA): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni01EB (U+01EB): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni01EC (U+01EC): found 22, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni01ED (U+01ED): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni01EE (U+01EE): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01EF (U+01EF): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni01F0 (U+01F0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni01F8 (U+01F8): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni01F9 (U+01F9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni021E (U+021E): found 20, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni021F (U+021F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni0232 (U+0232): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0233 (U+0233): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni0237 (U+0237): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni023A (U+023A): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni023B (U+023B): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni023C (U+023C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni023D (U+023D): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni023E (U+023E): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni0241 (U+0241): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0242 (U+0242): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0251 (U+0251): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0253 (U+0253): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0254 (U+0254): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0257 (U+0257): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0259 (U+0259): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni025B (U+025B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0261 (U+0261): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0263 (U+0263): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0268 (U+0268): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0269 (U+0269): found 6, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni026A (U+026A): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni026B (U+026B): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni026C (U+026C): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni0272 (U+0272): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0275 (U+0275): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • uni028A (U+028A): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni0292 (U+0292): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0294 (U+0294): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0295 (U+0295): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni02B7 (U+02B7): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B8 (U+02B8): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni02B9 (U+02B9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BB (U+02BB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BC (U+02BC): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BD (U+02BD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BE (U+02BE): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02BF (U+02BF): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C0 (U+02C0): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1, 0}
    • circumflex (U+02C6): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • caron (U+02C7): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • uni02C8 (U+02C8): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02C9 (U+02C9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CA (U+02CA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CB (U+02CB): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CC (U+02CC): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02CD (U+02CD): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni02D0 (U+02D0): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • uni02D7 (U+02D7): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • breve (U+02D8): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • ring (U+02DA): found 4, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • ogonek (U+02DB): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tilde (U+02DC): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • hungarumlaut (U+02DD): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • gravecomb (U+0300): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • acutecomb (U+0301): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0302 (U+0302): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • tildecomb (U+0303): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0304 (U+0304): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0306 (U+0306): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • hookabovecomb (U+0309): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030A (U+030A): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030B (U+030B): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uni030C (U+030C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni030D (U+030D): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0312 (U+0312): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0313 (U+0313): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0315 (U+0315): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni031B (U+031B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0326 (U+0326): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0327 (U+0327): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0328 (U+0328): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0329 (U+0329): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni032E (U+032E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0331 (U+0331): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0332 (U+0332): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0335 (U+0335): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0372 (U+0372): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni0373 (U+0373): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0374 (U+0374): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni0375 (U+0375): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni037E (U+037E): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • tonos (U+0384): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • dieresistonos (U+0385): found 4, expected one of: {3}
    • Alphatonos (U+0386): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • Etatonos (U+0389): found 19, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Iotatonos (U+038A): found 13, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • Omicrontonos (U+038C): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • Upsilontonos (U+038E): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • Omegatonos (U+038F): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • iotadieresistonos (U+0390): found 10, expected one of: {4}
    • Alpha (U+0391): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Beta (U+0392): found 20, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • Gamma (U+0393): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0394 (U+0394): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • Zeta (U+0396): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Eta (U+0397): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Theta (U+0398): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Iota (U+0399): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Kappa (U+039A): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • Lambda (U+039B): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Mu (U+039C): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • Nu (U+039D): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Xi (U+039E): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Omicron (U+039F): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • Pi (U+03A0): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Rho (U+03A1): found 15, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Sigma (U+03A3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • Tau (U+03A4): found 11, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Upsilon (U+03A5): found 10, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • Phi (U+03A6): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • Chi (U+03A7): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • Psi (U+03A8): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni03A9 (U+03A9): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • Iotadieresis (U+03AA): found 13, expected one of: {5, 3}
    • Upsilondieresis (U+03AB): found 12, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • alphatonos (U+03AC): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • epsilontonos (U+03AD): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • etatonos (U+03AE): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • iotatonos (U+03AF): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • upsilondieresistonos (U+03B0): found 15, expected one of: {4}
    • alpha (U+03B1): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • beta (U+03B2): found 20, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • gamma (U+03B3): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • delta (U+03B4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • epsilon (U+03B5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • zeta (U+03B6): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • eta (U+03B7): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • theta (U+03B8): found 19, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • iota (U+03B9): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • kappa (U+03BA): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • lambda (U+03BB): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03BC (U+03BC): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • nu (U+03BD): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • xi (U+03BE): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omicron (U+03BF): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • pi (U+03C0): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • rho (U+03C1): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • sigma1 (U+03C2): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • sigma (U+03C3): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • tau (U+03C4): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • upsilon (U+03C5): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • phi (U+03C6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • chi (U+03C7): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • psi (U+03C8): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • omega (U+03C9): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • iotadieresis (U+03CA): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • upsilondieresis (U+03CB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • omicrontonos (U+03CC): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • upsilontonos (U+03CD): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • omegatonos (U+03CE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni03D0 (U+03D0): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • theta1 (U+03D1): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • Upsilon1 (U+03D2): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3 (U+03D3): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4 (U+03D4): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • phi1 (U+03D5): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • omega1 (U+03D6): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni03D8 (U+03D8): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03D9 (U+03D9): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 18, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB (U+03DB): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DC (U+03DC): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03DD (U+03DD): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DE (U+03DE): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03DF (U+03DF): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E0 (U+03E0): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni03F0 (U+03F0): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni03F1 (U+03F1): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03F4 (U+03F4): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03F5 (U+03F5): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni03F6 (U+03F6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni03FC (U+03FC): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uni0404 (U+0404): found 16, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0405 (U+0405): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 5}
    • uni0406 (U+0406): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0408 (U+0408): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0413 (U+0413): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0417 (U+0417): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni041B (U+041B): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni041F (U+041F): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0421 (U+0421): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0422 (U+0422): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0427 (U+0427): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni042D (U+042D): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0433 (U+0433): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni0437 (U+0437): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0438 (U+0438): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni043B (U+043B): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043D (U+043D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni043F (U+043F): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0441 (U+0441): found 11, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni0442 (U+0442): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0443 (U+0443): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0445 (U+0445): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0447 (U+0447): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni044D (U+044D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0454 (U+0454): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni0455 (U+0455): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 5}
    • uni048C (U+048C): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048D (U+048D): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni048E (U+048E): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni048F (U+048F): found 17, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni0490 (U+0490): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0491 (U+0491): found 10, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni04A6 (U+04A6): found 24, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni04A7 (U+04A7): found 19, expected one of: {1, 4, 2}
    • uni04A8 (U+04A8): found 17, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04A9 (U+04A9): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04BC (U+04BC): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04BD (U+04BD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04BE (U+04BE): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni04BF (U+04BF): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni04C0 (U+04C0): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni04C3 (U+04C3): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04C4 (U+04C4): found 14, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni04C6 (U+04C6): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C7 (U+04C7): found 20, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni04C8 (U+04C8): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 1}
    • uni04CD (U+04CD): found 21, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • uni04CE (U+04CE): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2, 4}
    • uni04DA (U+04DA): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04DB (U+04DB): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04E0 (U+04E0): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni04E1 (U+04E1): found 16, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni04EA (U+04EA): found 21, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EB (U+04EB): found 17, expected one of: {5}
    • uni04EC (U+04EC): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni04ED (U+04ED): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni04FC (U+04FC): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni04FD (U+04FD): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni0510 (U+0510): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0511 (U+0511): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni0512 (U+0512): found 19, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni0513 (U+0513): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni0528 (U+0528): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0529 (U+0529): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni052F (U+052F): found 13, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni0E3F (U+0E3F): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • uni1D3A (U+1D3A): found 12, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni1DBB (U+1DBB): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni1DBF (U+1DBF): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0C (U+1E0C): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0D (U+1E0D): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E0E (U+1E0E): found 19, expected one of: {3}
    • uni1E0F (U+1E0F): found 19, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E15 (U+1E15): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E17 (U+1E17): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E20 (U+1E20): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E24 (U+1E24): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E25 (U+1E25): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E2A (U+1E2A): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4, 6}
    • uni1E2B (U+1E2B): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni1E30 (U+1E30): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E31 (U+1E31): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E32 (U+1E32): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E33 (U+1E33): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E34 (U+1E34): found 17, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E35 (U+1E35): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • uni1E36 (U+1E36): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E37 (U+1E37): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E38 (U+1E38): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E39 (U+1E39): found 14, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E3A (U+1E3A): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E3B (U+1E3B): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E3F (U+1E3F): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E42 (U+1E42): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E43 (U+1E43): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • uni1E44 (U+1E44): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E45 (U+1E45): found 13, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E46 (U+1E46): found 18, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E47 (U+1E47): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E48 (U+1E48): found 20, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E49 (U+1E49): found 15, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E50 (U+1E50): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni1E51 (U+1E51): found 17, expected one of: {12, 4}
    • uni1E52 (U+1E52): found 17, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E53 (U+1E53): found 17, expected one of: {4}
    • uni1E5A (U+1E5A): found 19, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • uni1E5B (U+1E5B): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E5C (U+1E5C): found 22, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1E5D (U+1E5D): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uni1E5E (U+1E5E): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E5F (U+1E5F): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E60 (U+1E60): found 16, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E61 (U+1E61): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E62 (U+1E62): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uni1E63 (U+1E63): found 14, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E6C (U+1E6C): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 3}
    • uni1E6D (U+1E6D): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E6E (U+1E6E): found 14, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E6F (U+1E6F): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E8E (U+1E8E): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • uni1E8F (U+1E8F): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E90 (U+1E90): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni1E91 (U+1E91): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E92 (U+1E92): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E93 (U+1E93): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • uni1E94 (U+1E94): found 18, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • uni1E95 (U+1E95): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni1E96 (U+1E96): found 17, expected one of: {5, 2, 3}
    • uni1E97 (U+1E97): found 14, expected one of: {5, 3, 4}
    • uni1EA0 (U+1EA0): found 17, expected one of: {7, 4, 3}
    • uni1EA1 (U+1EA1): found 15, expected one of: {3, 7, 2}
    • uni1EA2 (U+1EA2): found 19, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EA3 (U+1EA3): found 17, expected one of: {7, 2, 3}
    • uni1EAE (U+1EAE): found 19, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EAF (U+1EAF): found 21, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB0 (U+1EB0): found 19, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB1 (U+1EB1): found 21, expected one of: {3, 8, 4}
    • uni1EB3 (U+1EB3): found 22, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB5 (U+1EB5): found 25, expected one of: {8, 3, 4}
    • uni1EB6 (U+1EB6): found 22, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EB7 (U+1EB7): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 8}
    • uni1EB9 (U+1EB9): found 15, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EBB (U+1EBB): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EBD (U+1EBD): found 20, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EBF (U+1EBF): found 19, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC1 (U+1EC1): found 19, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EC3 (U+1EC3): found 20, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC5 (U+1EC5): found 23, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC7 (U+1EC7): found 18, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EC8 (U+1EC8): found 14, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EC9 (U+1EC9): found 11, expected one of: {6, 2}
    • uni1ECA (U+1ECA): found 12, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • uni1ECC (U+1ECC): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 2}
    • uni1ECD (U+1ECD): found 13, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1ECF (U+1ECF): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1ED1 (U+1ED1): found 17, expected one of: {5, 8, 4}
    • uni1ED3 (U+1ED3): found 17, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED5 (U+1ED5): found 18, expected one of: {5, 4, 8}
    • uni1ED7 (U+1ED7): found 21, expected one of: {8, 4, 5}
    • uni1ED9 (U+1ED9): found 16, expected one of: {4, 8, 5}
    • uni1EDA (U+1EDA): found 21, expected one of: {3, 4, 7}
    • uni1EDB (U+1EDB): found 17, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EDC (U+1EDC): found 21, expected one of: {3, 7, 4}
    • uni1EDD (U+1EDD): found 17, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EDF (U+1EDF): found 18, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE1 (U+1EE1): found 21, expected one of: {4, 3, 7}
    • uni1EE2 (U+1EE2): found 20, expected one of: {7, 3, 4}
    • uni1EE3 (U+1EE3): found 16, expected one of: {4, 7, 3}
    • uni1EE4 (U+1EE4): found 16, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EE5 (U+1EE5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EE6 (U+1EE6): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni1EE7 (U+1EE7): found 15, expected one of: {3, 6, 2}
    • ygrave (U+1EF3): found 18, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni1EF5 (U+1EF5): found 13, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • uni1EF7 (U+1EF7): found 19, expected one of: {2, 3, 6}
    • uni1EF9 (U+1EF9): found 22, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • uni2010 (U+2010): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2011 (U+2011): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • figuredash (U+2012): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • endash (U+2013): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • emdash (U+2014): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2015 (U+2015): found 6, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2016 (U+2016): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • quoteleft (U+2018): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quoteright (U+2019): found 3, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • quotesinglbase (U+201A): found 3, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • quotereversed (U+201B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • dagger (U+2020): found 11, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • bullet (U+2022): found 9, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • minute (U+2032): found 3, expected one of: {5, 1}
    • guilsinglleft (U+2039): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • guilsinglright (U+203A): found 3, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • uni203D (U+203D): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • fraction (U+2044): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2070 (U+2070): found 8, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uni2074 (U+2074): found 9, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2075 (U+2075): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2076 (U+2076): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2077 (U+2077): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2078 (U+2078): found 13, expected one of: {4, 1, 3}
    • uni2079 (U+2079): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207A (U+207A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207B (U+207B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni207C (U+207C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni207D (U+207D): found 5, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni207E (U+207E): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni207F (U+207F): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2080 (U+2080): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni2081 (U+2081): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2082 (U+2082): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2083 (U+2083): found 8, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2084 (U+2084): found 9, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2085 (U+2085): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • uni2086 (U+2086): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2087 (U+2087): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2088 (U+2088): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4, 1}
    • uni2089 (U+2089): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni208A (U+208A): found 5, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni208B (U+208B): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208C (U+208C): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • uni208D (U+208D): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni208E (U+208E): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 16, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • dong (U+20AB): found 23, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni20B5 (U+20B5): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • uni2105 (U+2105): found 20, expected one of: {5, 4}
    • uni2113 (U+2113): found 13, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2117 (U+2117): found 29, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • uni2120 (U+2120): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • Omega (U+2126): found 17, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uni2144 (U+2144): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 16, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • arrowleft (U+2190): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowup (U+2191): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowright (U+2192): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • arrowdown (U+2193): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • arrowboth (U+2194): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • arrowupdn (U+2195): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uni2196 (U+2196): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2197 (U+2197): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2198 (U+2198): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uni2199 (U+2199): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • partialdiff (U+2202): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • emptyset (U+2205): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • Delta (U+2206): found 15, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • product (U+220F): found 21, expected one of: {1, 3, 5}
    • summation (U+2211): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • minus (U+2212): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • uni2215 (U+2215): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    • radical (U+221A): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • infinity (U+221E): found 10, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • integral (U+222B): found 11, expected one of: {1, 5}
    • approxequal (U+2248): found 12, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • notequal (U+2260): found 15, expected one of: {7, 1, 3}
    • lessequal (U+2264): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • greaterequal (U+2265): found 8, expected one of: {6, 3, 2}
    • uni23CF (U+23CF): found 30, expected one of: {4, 2}
    • filledbox (U+25A0): found 42, expected one of: {1}
    • H22073 (U+25A1): found 24, expected one of: {2}
    • H18543 (U+25AA): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • H18551 (U+25AB): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • triagup (U+25B2): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B3 (U+25B3): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B4 (U+25B4): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B5 (U+25B5): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25B6 (U+25B6): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B7 (U+25B7): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25B8 (U+25B8): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25B9 (U+25B9): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • triagdn (U+25BC): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BD (U+25BD): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25BE (U+25BE): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25BF (U+25BF): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C0 (U+25C0): found 31, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C1 (U+25C1): found 18, expected one of: {2}
    • uni25C2 (U+25C2): found 14, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C3 (U+25C3): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni25C6 (U+25C6): found 25, expected one of: {1}
    • uni25C7 (U+25C7): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lozenge (U+25CA): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • circle (U+25CB): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • H18533 (U+25CF): found 37, expected one of: {1}
    • openbullet (U+25E6): found 8, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • spade (U+2660): found 25, expected one of: {1, 2, 276}
    • heart (U+2665): found 34, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E8 (U+27E8): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni27E9 (U+27E9): found 7, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uni2C62 (U+2C62): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • uni2C65 (U+2C65): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • uni2C66 (U+2C66): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • uni2C6D (U+2C6D): found 18, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • uni2E18 (U+2E18): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uni300A (U+300A): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uni300B (U+300B): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D0 (U+A4D0): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D1 (U+A4D1): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D2 (U+A4D2): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D3 (U+A4D3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4D4 (U+A4D4): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D5 (U+A4D5): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • uniA4D6 (U+A4D6): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D9 (U+A4D9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DA (U+A4DA): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DB (U+A4DB): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4DC (U+A4DC): found 15, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DF (U+A4DF): found 18, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4E0 (U+A4E0): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E1 (U+A4E1): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E2 (U+A4E2): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E5 (U+A4E5): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E6 (U+A4E6): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4E7 (U+A4E7): found 17, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • uniA4E8 (U+A4E8): found 17, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4E9 (U+A4E9): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4EA (U+A4EA): found 17, expected one of: {1, 4}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EC (U+A4EC): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uniA4ED (U+A4ED): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EE (U+A4EE): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4EF (U+A4EF): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 18, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 18, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uniA4F2 (U+A4F2): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F3 (U+A4F3): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F4 (U+A4F4): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F5 (U+A4F5): found 15, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F6 (U+A4F6): found 11, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4F7 (U+A4F7): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4F9 (U+A4F9): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA4FB (U+A4FB): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FC (U+A4FC): found 4, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FE (U+A4FE): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA4FF (U+A4FF): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • uniA78B (U+A78B): found 4, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA78C (U+A78C): found 3, expected one of: {1}
    • uniA7AC (U+A7AC): found 22, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AD (U+A7AD): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA7AE (U+A7AE): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • uniA7B3 (U+A7B3): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 4}
    • uniAB53 (U+AB53): found 11, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • uniFB29 (U+FB29): found 7, expected one of: {1}
    • uni11FB0 (U+11FB0): found 10, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • idotaccent (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • jacute (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • a.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • b.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • d.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • e.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1, 4}
    • f.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • g.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • h.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • i.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 1}
    • j.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • l.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • m.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 1, 2}
    • n.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • p.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • r.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • t.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • u.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • y.sc (unencoded): found 7, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • eth.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • thorn.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • germandbls.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • lslash.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • florin.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • hbar.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • ij.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • agrave.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • aacute.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • atilde.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {3}
    • adieresis.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4}
    • aring.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • amacron.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • abreve.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • aogonek.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • dcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3}
    • emacron.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2, 5, 3}
    • edotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 5}
    • gbreve.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {5, 2, 4}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • gdotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 5, 2}
    • iacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • icircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • idieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • idotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • igrave.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • imacron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • iogonek.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3, 2, 1}
    • kcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2, 4}
    • lacute.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcaron.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • nacute.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3, 2}
    • ncaron.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ncommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ntilde.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {4, 6, 2}
    • racute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcaron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2, 3, 4}
    • rcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • tcaron.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • tcedilla.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2}
    • uacute.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ubreve.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ucircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • udieresis.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • uhungarumlaut.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • ugrave.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • umacron.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uogonek.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • uring.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {4, 3}
    • yacute.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ycircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • ygrave.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {3, 4, 2}
    • q.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • ydieresis.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {4, 5, 3}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • one.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • two.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {4, 1, 2}
    • three.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 2, 3}
    • five.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • six.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {5, 2, 1}
    • seven.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • eight.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 7, 3}
    • nine.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 5, 2}
    • exclam.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • question.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {3, 2, 6}
    • exclamdown.sc (unencoded): found 4, expected one of: {2, 6}
    • questiondown.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2, 6, 3}
    • circumflexcomb_acutecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_gravecomb (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_hookabovecomb (unencoded): found 6, expected one of: {2}
    • circumflexcomb_tildecomb (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2}
    • hcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 4, 3}
    • itilde.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • jcircumflex.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • ldot.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • utilde.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • uhorn.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3, 1}
    • ddotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • gmacron.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • hdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • hbrevebelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • ldotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • mdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • ndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • rdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • tdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotaccent.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • tdieresis.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3}
    • adotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • ahookabove.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {3}
    • acircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {4}
    • abrevedotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {4}
    • ehookabove.sc (unencoded): found 19, expected one of: {2}
    • etilde.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {2}
    • ecircumflexdotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {3}
    • ihookabove.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • idotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • udotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornacute.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorngrave.sc (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2}
    • uhornhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorntilde.sc (unencoded): found 20, expected one of: {2}
    • uhorndotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2}
    • ydotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 8, expected one of: {2}
    • yhookabove.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ytilde.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {2}
    • edotbelow.sc (unencoded): found 17, expected one of: {2}
    • ymacron.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {2}
    • ibreve.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2}
    • eng.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {4, 2, 1}
    • uni0463.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 4}
    • delta.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • lambda.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • xi.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {3}
    • sigma.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1}
    • psi.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • omega.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 3}
    • alphatonos.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • epsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • etatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {1, 3, 2}
    • iotatonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilontonos.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • upsilondieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {3, 4}
    • omegatonos.sc (unencoded): found 15, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • iotadieresistonos.sc (unencoded): found 13, expected one of: {1, 4, 3}
    • tbar.sc (unencoded): found 11, expected one of: {2, 1, 3}
    • aeacute.sc (unencoded): found 22, expected one of: {5, 4, 3}
    • two.alt (unencoded): found 16, expected one of: {2, 1}
    • D.alt (unencoded): found 18, expected one of: {1, 2}
    • Dcaron.alt (unencoded): found 21, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03D2.sc (unencoded): found 10, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 14, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03DF.sc (unencoded): found 9, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03D3.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {2}
    • uni03D4.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {3}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 12, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are inferred from the typical amounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
    • onehalf (U+00BD): found 2, expected one of: {3, 4, 5}
    • uni013C (U+013C): found 1, expected one of: {6, 2, 3}
    • aringacute (U+01FB): found 3, expected one of: {5, 4, 6}
    • uni03DA (U+03DA): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • colonmonetary (U+20A1): found 2, expected one of: {3, 1, 5}
    • onethird (U+2153): found 2, expected one of: {3, 5, 4}
    • uniA4D7 (U+A4D7): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4D8 (U+A4D8): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4DD (U+A4DD): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4DE (U+A4DE): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4E3 (U+A4E3): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4E4 (U+A4E4): found 2, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4EB (U+A4EB): found 1, expected one of: {3}
    • uniA4F0 (U+A4F0): found 1, expected one of: {2, 3}
    • uniA4F1 (U+A4F1): found 1, expected one of: {3, 2}
    • gcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • lcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • tcommaaccent.sc (unencoded): found 1, expected one of: {2}
    • zero.sc (unencoded): found 3, expected one of: {5, 2}
    • uni03DB.sc (unencoded): found 2, expected one of: {1}
    • uni03E1.sc (unencoded): found 5, expected one of: {1}
    [code: contour-count]

Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?

Check ID: ligature_carets
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table.

    [code: lacks-caret-pos]

Check math signs have the same width.

Check ID: math_signs_width
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greater, lessequal, greaterequal, less

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greater, greaterequal, lessequal, less

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: lessequal, greaterequal, less, greater

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: less, greater, greaterequal, lessequal

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greaterequal, lessequal, less, greater

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: less, greaterequal, lessequal, greater

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: less, lessequal, greaterequal, greater

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: less, greater, lessequal, greaterequal

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greaterequal, greater, less, lessequal

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greaterequal, greater, less, lessequal

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greaterequal, less, greater, lessequal

    [code: width-outliers]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The most common width is 600 among a set of 13 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though: width=400: greater, lessequal, greaterequal, less

    [code: width-outliers]

Ensure small caps glyphs are available

Check ID: missing_small_caps_glyphs
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni2D14
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D1D
    • uni1ED7
    • uni2D22
    • zacute
    • uni044E
    • x
    • uni2D12
    • uni10E1
    • sacute
    • uni04DF
    • uniFB00
    • uni045C
    • uni10D9
    • uni2D13
    • uni10DE
    • uni1E93
    • zdotaccent
    • uni2D24
    • uni2D07
    • uni026A
    • uni0453
    • uni04B3
    • uni0448
    • uni2D0E
    • uni04A5
    • uni04DD
    • uni028A
    • uni045F
    • uni0446
    • uniFB03
    • uni2D09
    • uni025B
    • uni0497
    • uni2D1C
    • uni2D0B
    • uni04A3
    • uni0242
    • uni04F9
    • uni04FF
    • uni04C2
    • uni04E7
    • uni1ED1
    • uni044D
    • uni1EDB
    • uni0454
    • uni052F
    • uni10EB
    • uni2D11
    • w
    • uni0434
    • uni043D
    • uni049D
    • uni10F8
    • omicron
    • uni0219
    • uni10D8
    • uni04FD
    • uni10EA
    • uni051D
    • uni0251
    • uni10D6
    • uni10DF
    • uni04E3
    • ograve
    • uni10DC
    • uni2D1E
    • uni10E2
    • uni2D1F
    • uniFB04
    • uni1EE3
    • uni045D
    • wgrave
    • uni043A
    • uni2113
    • uni0439
    • uni10E6
    • uni044F
    • uni04BF
    • uni044A
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D10
    • uni0275
    • uni04EB
    • uni2D27
    • uni10D2
    • oslash
    • uni04CC
    • uni10D4
    • uni0432
    • uni01EB
    • omicrontonos
    • o
    • uni10D3
    • uni10FA
    • oslashacute
    • uni0433
    • uni10E8
    • uni0560
    • uni049B
    • uni2D01
    • uniAB53
    • uni01ED
    • scaron
    • uni0373
    • uni2D21
    • uni10EC
    • uni0261
    • uni2D08
    • uni04F7
    • uni2D04
    • uni043C
    • uni1E53
    • uni10FF
    • z
    • scedilla
    • scircumflex
    • v
    • uni10FD
    • uni0475
    • kappa
    • uni03D9
    • odieresis
    • uni2D05
    • uni2D1B
    • ohorn
    • uni10E3
    • uni10DB
    • obreve
    • uni0459
    • uni10D7
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni048B
    • uni04C4
    • uni10F5
    • uni10E4
    • cacute
    • uni2D19
    • uni0447
    • uni1ED3
    • uni0525
    • uni1E95
    • uni1EDF
    • uni10F7
    • uni0437
    • uni0455
    • uni2D15
    • uni04A1
    • uni2D0F
    • uni04ED
    • uni0499
    • uni10D1
    • uni10E9
    • uni04CA
    • uni04F5
    • uni04FB
    • wcircumflex
    • ccedilla
    • uni10ED
    • uni10DA
    • omacron
    • uni043E
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D20
    • uni04B7
    • uni0449
    • uni03FC
    • uni10E0
    • uni2D0D
    • uni04AD
    • uni1ED9
    • uni1E63
    • uni1ECD
    • uni0493
    • uni04C8
    • uni0442
    • uni0513
    • uni045A
    • otilde
    • uni04A9
    • cdotaccent
    • uni0436
    • uni04D9
    • uni2D17
    • uni2D1A
    • uni044B
    • uni2D0A
    • uni046B
    • uni023C
    • uni2D25
    • uni0438
    • uni10FE
    • uni0269
    • uni04B9
    • uni03D7
    • uni0491
    • uni04DB
    • uni10F9
    • wacute
    • uni04CE
    • uni1ECF
    • uni01D2
    • uni2D23
    • c
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni0254
    • uni04AB
    • uni04C6
    • uniFB01
    • uni0588
    • uni0585
    • uni10D0
    • ocircumflex
    • uni10DD
    • uniFB02
    • uni1EDD
    • uni2D00
    • uni0441
    • uni0445
    • uni044C
    • uni10F0
    • uni2D2D
    • uni10F1
    • uni0511
    • uni10D5
    • uni10E5
    • wdieresis
    • uni1E91
    • uni1E51
    • uni2D06
    • mu
    • uni2D18
    • uni10EF
    • uni1ED5
    • uni10E7
    • ccircumflex
    • uni2D0C
    • uni2D16
    • uni10F2
    • uni04E9
    • uni04E5
    • uni1EE1
    • zcaron
    • uni0495
    • uni10F3
    • uni043F
    • uni0473
    • oacute
    • uni04BD
    • uni10F6
    • uni043B
    • s
    • uni0259
    • uni10EE
    • uni10F4
    • uni0529
    • ccaron
    • uni1E61
    • uni04A7
    • uni0527
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CAD
    • uni1EA8
    • uni10B7
    • uni1ED0
    • uni10BC
    • uni10B9
    • uni1C93
    • uni1C90
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1C99
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CBA
    • uni10C7
    • uni10C4
    • uni10A3
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CB4
    • uni1EB2
    • uni10BA
    • uni10C2
    • uni1C98
    • uni10AA
    • uni01D7
    • uni10B6
    • uni1ED2
    • Omega
    • uni01D9
    • uni10C3
    • uni1C9B
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1C9F
    • uni10A5
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10A6
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10B1
    • uni1E52
    • uni1C92
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1E14
    • uni10A1
    • uni10BD
    • uni1C96
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1CBE
    • uni10AB
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1E16
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1ED6
    • Aringacute
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1EAA
    • uni10AF
    • uni10C1
    • uni1CBD
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1C94
    • uni10AE
    • uni10A2
    • uni1CA2
    • uni10B5
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1CA5
    • uni10B2
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CB8
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10BB
    • uni1C97
    • uni1CB0
    • uni10B3
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1CAA
    • uni10C0
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10A7
    • uni10A8
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10AC
    • uni1E50
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10A4
    • uni10B8
    • uni10A0
    • uni1CA8
    • uni10B4
    • uni1EA6
    • uni10AD
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1CB5
    • uni1CAB
    • uni10A9
    • uni01DB
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1C91
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10C5
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni10FA
    • uni045A
    • uni2D0A
    • uni04A9
    • uni025B
    • uni2D23
    • uni10E9
    • uni10F3
    • uni01ED
    • uni0453
    • uni043B
    • otilde
    • uni0251
    • uni0437
    • oslash
    • uni10FF
    • zdotaccent
    • uni10D9
    • uni10EE
    • uni10D0
    • uni10E5
    • uni10EF
    • uni2D06
    • uni04B9
    • uni10D5
    • scircumflex
    • zacute
    • uni2D1D
    • uniFB04
    • uni0254
    • uni04A3
    • uni10E7
    • uni2D09
    • uni10F7
    • uni0527
    • uni0275
    • uni0475
    • mu
    • uni1EDB
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D20
    • uni04C6
    • uni04F9
    • uni1ED9
    • uni028A
    • uni0373
    • uni10DE
    • v
    • uni04FD
    • uni04DF
    • uni2D05
    • uni2D18
    • uni2D07
    • uni04D9
    • omicrontonos
    • uniFB02
    • uni10E4
    • uni10F0
    • uni044D
    • uni045D
    • uni04E7
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0219
    • uni023C
    • ograve
    • scedilla
    • uni048B
    • uni026A
    • uni10DF
    • uni2D0B
    • uni044B
    • z
    • uni1E61
    • uni2D10
    • uni10E8
    • uni2D0D
    • uni2D16
    • wgrave
    • uni043D
    • uni04CA
    • uni10F8
    • uni045C
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D1B
    • uni1EDF
    • uni10F4
    • wacute
    • uni2D13
    • uni04A7
    • uni0432
    • uni04ED
    • uni2D1E
    • uni1ED7
    • uniFB00
    • uni0259
    • uni044F
    • uni10D6
    • uni2D25
    • uni049D
    • ccaron
    • uni04AB
    • uni043A
    • uni10F2
    • uni0261
    • omacron
    • uni2D1F
    • uni10F1
    • uni04DD
    • uni01D2
    • uni2D22
    • uni1ED1
    • uni0436
    • uni0525
    • uni0491
    • uni0459
    • uni0442
    • uni0446
    • uniFB01
    • cdotaccent
    • uni044C
    • uni0434
    • uni043C
    • ohorn
    • oslashacute
    • uni03FC
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D14
    • uni2113
    • uni0588
    • sacute
    • uni0560
    • uni049B
    • uni10D3
    • uni1ED3
    • c
    • uni10D4
    • uni1E53
    • uni0455
    • uni052F
    • oacute
    • cacute
    • uni2D04
    • uni10DB
    • uni10E1
    • uni2D00
    • uni1EDD
    • uni10EA
    • uni043F
    • uni2D12
    • uni04AD
    • uni0497
    • w
    • uni0511
    • uni1EE1
    • uni10D1
    • uni04F7
    • uni10E0
    • uni1EE3
    • scaron
    • ccedilla
    • uni1ECD
    • uni04DB
    • uni0529
    • uni044E
    • uni10DA
    • uni03D9
    • uni10EB
    • uni10F5
    • uni2D08
    • uni04A5
    • o
    • uni2D27
    • uni10DC
    • uni04E3
    • obreve
    • uni04CE
    • uni043E
    • s
    • uni1E63
    • uni0441
    • ocircumflex
    • uni045F
    • uni04C2
    • uni04EB
    • uni10F9
    • uni1ECF
    • uni10FE
    • uni2D01
    • uni2D1A
    • uniFB03
    • uni04B7
    • uni04B3
    • uni10E2
    • uni10EC
    • uniAB53
    • uni0585
    • uni0449
    • uni04E5
    • uni04F5
    • uni0433
    • omicron
    • uni04BF
    • uni2D24
    • wdieresis
    • uni0439
    • uni04BD
    • uni01EB
    • x
    • uni044A
    • uni04FB
    • uni0499
    • uni2D1C
    • uni0269
    • uni10F6
    • uni1ED5
    • ccircumflex
    • uni0513
    • uni04FF
    • uni1E91
    • uni0448
    • uni1E95
    • uni10FD
    • uni10E6
    • wcircumflex
    • uni10D7
    • uni0438
    • ohungarumlaut
    • kappa
    • uni10D8
    • uni04C4
    • uni10D2
    • uni0445
    • uni03D7
    • uni2D17
    • uni10ED
    • uni2D0C
    • uni0447
    • uni04E9
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni04A1
    • uni0242
    • uni10DD
    • uni2D0F
    • uni2D19
    • uni2D21
    • uni04CC
    • uni1E93
    • uni10E3
    • uni04C8
    • uni2D2D
    • zcaron
    • uni0473
    • uni0495
    • uni1E51
    • uni2D15
    • uni046B
    • uni051D
    • uni0493
    • odieresis
    • uni2D11
    • uni0454
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni10AD
    • uni1C9D
    • uni10B1
    • uni10B6
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1CB1
    • uni10B2
    • uni10BC
    • uni10A4
    • uni10C4
    • uni1CB4
    • uni1CAA
    • uni10A6
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1C95
    • uni10B8
    • uni10B9
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1C92
    • uni1E50
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1CBD
    • uni10B4
    • uni10A9
    • Aringacute
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CA3
    • uni10B3
    • uni1CB7
    • uni10CD
    • uni1EC0
    • uni01DB
    • uni10AF
    • uni10B7
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1E14
    • uni10A8
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CAD
    • uni10BB
    • uni10BA
    • uni10A1
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1C91
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1CBE
    • uni1E52
    • Omega
    • uni10AB
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1CA1
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1ED2
    • uni1EAA
    • uni10C2
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10C0
    • uni10BD
    • uni1C96
    • uni1CB9
    • uni10AE
    • uni1C98
    • uni10A2
    • uni1CA0
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C94
    • uni10C5
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10BE
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1E16
    • uni10B5
    • uni10A0
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10AC
    • uni1C99
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1EB0
    • uni10AA
    • uni1EB2
    • uni01D9
    • uni1EA8
    • uni10C7
    • uni01D7
    • uni10A5
    • uni1CA5
    • uni10C1
    • uni1CB2
    • uni10C3
    • uni1C97
    • uni1ED4
    • uni1CB5
    • uni10A7
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1C90
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1CB6
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni04C8
    • uni04BF
    • uni10F2
    • uniFB04
    • uni10EA
    • uni044F
    • uni0251
    • uni0433
    • uni051D
    • uni2D1D
    • uni10FD
    • uni0525
    • uni01EB
    • uni04A3
    • omicrontonos
    • uni2D08
    • otilde
    • uni04F9
    • uni04FB
    • uni10EF
    • uni04A1
    • ccaron
    • uni10D1
    • uni0453
    • ccircumflex
    • uni0475
    • uni10D3
    • scedilla
    • uni0254
    • ocircumflex
    • uni10EE
    • uni2D16
    • uni0449
    • uni03FC
    • uni04F7
    • uni04E7
    • uni10EB
    • uni0459
    • uni2D25
    • omacron
    • uni049B
    • uni2D04
    • uni1ED7
    • uni2D1A
    • s
    • uni10D0
    • wdieresis
    • wgrave
    • uni04BD
    • x
    • uni044D
    • uni0219
    • uni0499
    • cdotaccent
    • uni1ED1
    • ograve
    • uni0491
    • uni01D2
    • uni10D9
    • uni04E9
    • uni03D9
    • uni2113
    • uni2D22
    • wacute
    • uni0373
    • uni10D4
    • uni045F
    • uni0442
    • scaron
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D24
    • uni0497
    • uni10DE
    • uni049D
    • ccedilla
    • uni10F8
    • uni2D2D
    • uni10F6
    • v
    • zacute
    • uni2D12
    • cacute
    • uni2D1E
    • uni1EDB
    • uni2D0C
    • uni04A7
    • uni1E91
    • uni2D11
    • uni2D13
    • uni10E7
    • uni0441
    • uni1EE3
    • uni2D19
    • uni10E6
    • uni10FE
    • uni1E93
    • uni043D
    • uni043B
    • uni10E9
    • uni043C
    • uni043A
    • uni052F
    • scircumflex
    • uni10E1
    • oacute
    • omicron
    • uni10E2
    • uni2D06
    • uni2D18
    • oslash
    • uni044A
    • uni04C2
    • uni2D00
    • uni048B
    • ohorn
    • uni0588
    • uniFB03
    • uni044E
    • uni10F5
    • uni10F7
    • uni026A
    • uniFB01
    • uni2D1C
    • uni10F1
    • uni04DB
    • uni028A
    • uni10FF
    • uni023C
    • odieresis
    • uni0495
    • uni04B9
    • uni04ED
    • uni1EE1
    • uni04FF
    • uni2D21
    • uni0445
    • uni0275
    • uni2D0A
    • uni1ECD
    • uni0513
    • uni10E4
    • uni10D2
    • uni10D7
    • uni1E61
    • w
    • uni04B3
    • uni10E3
    • uni0439
    • uni1E53
    • mu
    • uni2D0B
    • uni0529
    • uni04CC
    • uni2D03
    • uni10F0
    • uni2D15
    • uni1ECF
    • uni10DD
    • uni10FA
    • uni2D0F
    • uni04AB
    • uniAB53
    • uni045D
    • uni04D9
    • wcircumflex
    • z
    • uni046B
    • uni0493
    • uni0261
    • uni10F3
    • uni10F4
    • uni04CE
    • uni04A5
    • uni10E0
    • uni0454
    • uni10DC
    • uni045C
    • zdotaccent
    • uni1ED3
    • uni04C6
    • uni04DF
    • uni2D09
    • uni04B7
    • uni0269
    • o
    • uni10D5
    • uni043E
    • uni2D07
    • uni2D17
    • uni0242
    • uni2D0E
    • uni04A9
    • uni10DB
    • uni0448
    • uni2D0D
    • uni0455
    • sacute
    • uni10DF
    • uni2D1B
    • uni04C4
    • uni1EDF
    • uni1ED5
    • ohungarumlaut
    • obreve
    • uni10EC
    • uni2D20
    • uni10F9
    • uni044C
    • uni10E5
    • uni0446
    • uni04E3
    • uni04E5
    • uni10E8
    • uni0434
    • kgreenlandic
    • kappa
    • uni2D1F
    • uni1EDD
    • uni2D10
    • uni10ED
    • uni0473
    • uni045A
    • uni04FD
    • uni0259
    • uni043F
    • uni0447
    • uni10DA
    • uni04F5
    • uni0560
    • uni1E63
    • uni04DD
    • uni2D23
    • zcaron
    • uni01ED
    • uniFB02
    • oslashacute
    • uni0436
    • uni04CA
    • uni0438
    • uni044B
    • uni04AD
    • uni10D8
    • uni2D01
    • uni2D27
    • uni10D6
    • uni0511
    • uni1E95
    • uniFB00
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D05
    • uni0527
    • uni0432
    • uni1E51
    • uni0437
    • uni2D14
    • uni03D7
    • uni04EB
    • uni025B
    • uni1ED9
    • c
    • uni0585
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni10AF
    • uni1CBE
    • uni10A7
    • uni1CA7
    • uni10A6
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10AD
    • uni10C2
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CB6
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10A8
    • uni1CB2
    • uni01DB
    • uni10C1
    • uni1C9C
    • uni01D7
    • uni1E14
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1EB2
    • uni1ED2
    • uni10B9
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1C9F
    • uni10AB
    • uni1CA0
    • uni10B7
    • uni1C92
    • Aringacute
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1E50
    • uni1E52
    • uni10A0
    • uni10C3
    • uni10C4
    • uni1C9E
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10C0
    • uni1CBD
    • uni10BA
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10B8
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10BC
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1C98
    • uni1CAC
    • uni10AA
    • uni01D9
    • uni1CAA
    • uni1C97
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1EA6
    • uni10C7
    • uni1C96
    • uni1CB1
    • uni10B3
    • uni10BB
    • uni1C91
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1EA4
    • uni10A5
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1E16
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1CB5
    • uni1C99
    • uni10BE
    • uni10AE
    • uni10B6
    • uni1EB4
    • uni10A1
    • uni10AC
    • Omega
    • uni10B5
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1EB0
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CB3
    • uni10B2
    • uni1C94
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1CA2
    • uni10B1
    • uni10BF
    • uni10A2
    • uni10A9
    • uni10A4
    • uni10BD
    • uni10B0
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1C9B
    • uni10B4
    • uni10C5
    • uni1CB4
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1C90
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1CBF
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni10E1
    • uni1ECD
    • uni0437
    • uni0499
    • uni0529
    • uni10E9
    • uni2D23
    • uni2D12
    • uni044B
    • uni04BD
    • uni10D3
    • uni04AD
    • uni2D0B
    • v
    • uni10DD
    • uniFB02
    • uni028A
    • uni2D0C
    • uni025B
    • uni0432
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni1ED5
    • uni0445
    • uni0511
    • uni04F9
    • uni2D04
    • uni10D1
    • uni2D1A
    • uni10DB
    • uni0436
    • zcaron
    • uni10F3
    • omicrontonos
    • uni10D8
    • uni0447
    • uni10FE
    • uni0588
    • o
    • uni1E91
    • uni04A5
    • uni2D20
    • uni0449
    • uni04DB
    • ccaron
    • uni10E3
    • uni10ED
    • uni049D
    • uni043C
    • uni04CC
    • uni04C8
    • uni2D25
    • uni04C2
    • uni10E4
    • oacute
    • uni04A3
    • uni1ED9
    • uni0442
    • uni026A
    • uni10D2
    • uni04E3
    • uni0453
    • zacute
    • uni10F1
    • oslashacute
    • uni04B3
    • uni01D2
    • uni1EDF
    • uni2D22
    • uni2D14
    • obreve
    • uni2D0E
    • uni1ED3
    • uni2D17
    • uni10D5
    • uni04F7
    • omacron
    • uni023C
    • uni10DC
    • uni10D4
    • uni1ED1
    • uni0373
    • uni2D05
    • cdotaccent
    • uni044F
    • x
    • uni04FB
    • uni04CE
    • uniFB00
    • wdieresis
    • uni10E2
    • uni10EA
    • uni2D01
    • uni10F4
    • uni2D08
    • mu
    • uni1EDD
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni1E51
    • wacute
    • ccedilla
    • uni10E7
    • uni2D10
    • uni045C
    • scedilla
    • uni044C
    • uni0251
    • wgrave
    • ohorn
    • uni04EB
    • uni052F
    • uni04F5
    • uni0525
    • uni0433
    • uni10D6
    • uni1E63
    • odieresis
    • cacute
    • uni045F
    • uni0459
    • uni1EE1
    • uni0219
    • uni04DF
    • uni10F6
    • uni1ECF
    • uni051D
    • uni2D0D
    • uniFB01
    • uni0438
    • uni0441
    • uni04BF
    • uni0513
    • uni0491
    • uni2D11
    • s
    • uni10F7
    • uni0259
    • uni2D13
    • uni0495
    • uni2D1F
    • uni2D09
    • uni1ED7
    • uni0493
    • uni10EB
    • uni10DE
    • uni2D06
    • otilde
    • ograve
    • uni2D1C
    • uni04B5
    • uni04E9
    • uni1EDB
    • uni044E
    • uni2D1B
    • uni0527
    • uni2D18
    • uni0473
    • uni0455
    • uni2D00
    • uni048B
    • uni0585
    • uni049B
    • uni0439
    • uni2D02
    • uni04A7
    • uniFB03
    • uni10EF
    • uni0242
    • uni2D1E
    • uni10FA
    • uni1E93
    • uni044A
    • uni1E61
    • uni2D16
    • uni04E5
    • uni1EE3
    • uni2D21
    • ccircumflex
    • uni10D9
    • uni10F9
    • uniFB04
    • uni04FD
    • wcircumflex
    • uni045D
    • uni04D9
    • uni0448
    • zdotaccent
    • oslash
    • uni0497
    • uniAB53
    • scircumflex
    • uni2113
    • uni2D07
    • uni1E95
    • uni04E7
    • uni0475
    • uni10F8
    • uni10D7
    • uni1E53
    • uni0261
    • uni10E6
    • scaron
    • uni0275
    • uni10F2
    • kappa
    • uni03FC
    • uni0446
    • uni045A
    • uni043E
    • uni04DD
    • uni10EC
    • uni10FD
    • uni2D0F
    • uni046B
    • c
    • uni2D03
    • z
    • uni0269
    • uni2D19
    • omicron
    • uni10EE
    • uni2D2D
    • uni043D
    • uni0560
    • uni10E8
    • uni04B9
    • uni2D27
    • uni044D
    • uni043A
    • uni04B7
    • w
    • uni10FF
    • uni10F0
    • uni0434
    • sacute
    • uni03D9
    • uni04A9
    • uni04ED
    • uni2D1D
    • uni10DA
    • uni043B
    • uni04CA
    • uni10D0
    • uni10DF
    • uni03D7
    • uni04C4
    • uni10E5
    • uni2D15
    • ocircumflex
    • uni04A1
    • uni04FF
    • uni0254
    • uni01ED
    • uni043F
    • uni2D24
    • uni0454
    • uni04AB
    • uni10E0
    • uni04C6
    • uni01EB
    • uni10F5
    • uni2D0A
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CB0
    • uni10C5
    • uni1E52
    • uni10B2
    • uni1E14
    • uni10B8
    • uni1CB5
    • uni01D7
    • uni10BD
    • uni1C93
    • Omega
    • uni1EA6
    • uni10C4
    • uni1E50
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1E16
    • uni10AF
    • uni1CBF
    • uni10B5
    • uni10C1
    • uni10A7
    • uni10B6
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1C9C
    • uni10AA
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1C96
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1CA1
    • uni1CA0
    • uni10BF
    • uni10A9
    • uni10B7
    • uni10AB
    • uni10A2
    • uni10B4
    • Aringacute
    • uni1C99
    • uni1CA8
    • uni10A4
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10AC
    • uni1CBD
    • uni01DB
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1C92
    • uni1C91
    • uni1C95
    • uni10C7
    • uni10B9
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1CB3
    • uni10AE
    • uni1CAB
    • uni01D9
    • uni1CBA
    • uni10C2
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1CAF
    • uni10A0
    • uni1C98
    • uni10A8
    • uni1CA5
    • uni10B1
    • uni1CB4
    • uni1ED2
    • uni1CB9
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10AD
    • uni1CBE
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1ED6
    • uni10B3
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1EA8
    • uni10A6
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10BC
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1CB6
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1C97
    • uni10A1
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1C90
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1C94
    • uni10A5
    • uni1CAA
    • uni10BA
    • uni10BB
    • uni1EB2
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C9E
    • uni1EC4
    • uni10C0
    • uni1CA9
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni1E95
    • uni04BF
    • uni2D1E
    • uni2D24
    • uni03D9
    • uni0436
    • wgrave
    • uni043E
    • oslashacute
    • uni0527
    • uni043B
    • scedilla
    • uni052F
    • uni044B
    • uni045C
    • uni0560
    • uni049D
    • uni2D1C
    • uni04E9
    • uni04BD
    • uni0495
    • uni2D05
    • v
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D1A
    • uni10EA
    • uni2D20
    • uni0275
    • uni10D5
    • c
    • uni0491
    • uni2D18
    • uni0497
    • sacute
    • uni04A7
    • uni10D1
    • uni1EDD
    • uni0251
    • uni028A
    • uni0373
    • uni043F
    • uni2D0B
    • ograve
    • uni0439
    • uni10DA
    • uni10FE
    • uni2D1D
    • uni04F9
    • uni04FD
    • uni1ED7
    • uni2D17
    • uni04DB
    • uni10E5
    • uni2D0C
    • uni10E4
    • uni0511
    • oslash
    • uni04CA
    • uni2D1B
    • uni04AB
    • uni1ECD
    • uni025B
    • uni0513
    • uni2D1F
    • uni10D0
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni10D6
    • uni10E2
    • omicron
    • uni10D4
    • uni10F5
    • uni043D
    • mu
    • uni10E1
    • uni10EF
    • uni1E63
    • ohorn
    • uni10D8
    • uni044D
    • uni04FB
    • uni04FF
    • uni04AD
    • uni10F7
    • uni1EE3
    • uni2D03
    • uni01EB
    • uni2D2D
    • uni044F
    • uni1E51
    • s
    • uni1ECF
    • uni2D06
    • wcircumflex
    • uni10DE
    • uni04E3
    • uni2D21
    • uni0454
    • uni0475
    • uni048B
    • uni2D0E
    • uni10F1
    • uni04B3
    • uni01ED
    • uni2D0D
    • uni023C
    • uni04A1
    • uni04C4
    • uni10FF
    • uni046B
    • uni10F6
    • uni0433
    • uni10FD
    • uni0525
    • cacute
    • wdieresis
    • uni2D10
    • uni10DC
    • uni2D13
    • uni026A
    • uni0242
    • uni04CE
    • uni04DF
    • uni10F3
    • w
    • uni10E8
    • uni04ED
    • uni2D0A
    • uni10D7
    • uni0441
    • uni2D14
    • uni044E
    • uni2D07
    • uni043A
    • uni10F9
    • uni2D16
    • ccaron
    • scircumflex
    • zdotaccent
    • uni0588
    • uniFB04
    • uni1E91
    • uni2D27
    • odieresis
    • uni10E9
    • uni0493
    • uni2D12
    • uni0455
    • uni0261
    • uni10D2
    • zcaron
    • uni10E6
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni03D7
    • uniFB03
    • uni044C
    • uni10F0
    • uni2D02
    • z
    • ccedilla
    • uni0459
    • uni04B7
    • otilde
    • uni043C
    • zacute
    • uni01D2
    • uni04DD
    • uni0529
    • uni04F7
    • uni10ED
    • uni0448
    • uni10EE
    • ocircumflex
    • uni04D9
    • uni051D
    • uni0447
    • uni0442
    • uni0438
    • uni04C8
    • uni0219
    • uni0254
    • oacute
    • uni04CC
    • uni044A
    • wacute
    • uni2D01
    • uni1ED5
    • uni1EDF
    • uni10DF
    • uni0449
    • uni03FC
    • uni0259
    • omicrontonos
    • uni10D3
    • uni1E93
    • uni04EB
    • uni04F5
    • uni10E7
    • uni1ED9
    • omacron
    • o
    • uni1EE1
    • uni10F2
    • uni2D11
    • uni2113
    • uni10DD
    • ccircumflex
    • uni2D09
    • uni2D04
    • uni1ED1
    • uni0432
    • x
    • uniAB53
    • uni2D00
    • uni04A3
    • kappa
    • uni0445
    • uni0585
    • uni1E53
    • uni0473
    • uni2D0F
    • uni04B9
    • uni049B
    • uni10E3
    • uni2D22
    • uni045A
    • uni10D9
    • uni0437
    • uni10F8
    • uni04A9
    • uni04A5
    • scaron
    • uni10E0
    • uni10FA
    • uni10DB
    • uni0499
    • uni10EB
    • uni2D15
    • uni04C6
    • uni0453
    • uni045D
    • obreve
    • uni04E5
    • uni04C2
    • uniFB02
    • uni1EDB
    • uni0446
    • uni10F4
    • uni2D23
    • uni04E7
    • uni1ED3
    • uni2D08
    • uni0434
    • uniFB00
    • uni0269
    • uni2D25
    • uni10EC
    • uni045F
    • uni2D19
    • cdotaccent
    • uni1E61
    • uniFB01
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CBE
    • uni10C7
    • uni1CA1
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10AB
    • uni10A7
    • uni10C4
    • uni1CBD
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1C96
    • uni10AE
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10B0
    • uni1C97
    • uni1ED2
    • uni1EC4
    • Omega
    • uni1CA4
    • uni10B6
    • uni1E52
    • uni10A4
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1CAA
    • uni10C0
    • uni10B9
    • uni1C90
    • uni10AC
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1CAF
    • uni10AA
    • uni10B5
    • uni01D9
    • uni10AD
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1C93
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C94
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1CA8
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10B8
    • uni1C99
    • uni10C5
    • uni10C2
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10B2
    • uni1CAC
    • uni01DB
    • uni10BB
    • uni1C9C
    • uni10C1
    • uni10B1
    • uni1EA8
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1E14
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10A1
    • uni10BC
    • uni1CB5
    • uni10A6
    • uni01D7
    • uni10A5
    • uni10BD
    • uni1C98
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1EC0
    • uni10BA
    • uni1EB2
    • Aringacute
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1E50
    • uni1EB4
    • uni10B7
    • uni10B4
    • uni10A9
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1C92
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1EC2
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1E16
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10A8
    • uni10B3
    • uni10A0
    • uni1ED0
    • uni10A2
    • uni10AF
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1C91
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni10EF
    • uni0459
    • uni045C
    • omacron
    • uni0441
    • uni2D1E
    • uni0448
    • uni10E3
    • uni10E6
    • uni10F3
    • uni04B3
    • uni10D8
    • uniFB02
    • uni1E93
    • uni10D4
    • uni2D27
    • v
    • uni10E2
    • uni1ED5
    • uni0219
    • uni0275
    • x
    • uni0438
    • uni046B
    • uni01EB
    • uni10E7
    • uni10EB
    • uni1E95
    • uni1EDD
    • uni0251
    • uni2D25
    • uni10F1
    • uni04DF
    • uni10DC
    • uni10ED
    • uni04A7
    • uni1EE3
    • uni2D24
    • uni1ED3
    • uni2D1A
    • uni2D22
    • uni026A
    • uni1EE1
    • uni04BF
    • uni04CC
    • uni2113
    • uni2D0D
    • uni044D
    • uni2D23
    • uni0261
    • uni2D17
    • oacute
    • uni0475
    • odieresis
    • uni04BD
    • uni04E5
    • uni04FB
    • uni10F6
    • uni0529
    • uni04C6
    • uni04C4
    • omicron
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D00
    • uni04F5
    • uni0442
    • cdotaccent
    • uni10E4
    • scedilla
    • uni0527
    • uni2D1C
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni1E61
    • uni043C
    • wgrave
    • uni1ED1
    • uni0433
    • uni04A3
    • uni04F7
    • uni04DB
    • uni043E
    • uni04EB
    • uni04E7
    • uni10FD
    • uni2D14
    • zacute
    • uni0454
    • uni1ED7
    • uni044F
    • uniFB00
    • uni10F7
    • uni01D2
    • uni04CE
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D08
    • uni1E91
    • uni10D0
    • ccircumflex
    • uni0495
    • uni0453
    • omicrontonos
    • uni2D0E
    • uni04C2
    • uni2D0A
    • uni03D7
    • uni0437
    • uni2D15
    • uni051D
    • cacute
    • uni025B
    • uni10F5
    • uni04A5
    • uniFB01
    • uni1E63
    • uni2D09
    • uni0499
    • uni0447
    • uni10D1
    • uni04FF
    • oslashacute
    • uni0449
    • uni043D
    • uni045F
    • z
    • uni0446
    • uni10FE
    • uniFB04
    • uni028A
    • otilde
    • uni0434
    • uni10E0
    • zcaron
    • ohorn
    • uni043B
    • uni10F2
    • uni2D06
    • uni2D0B
    • uniAB53
    • uni04E9
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni044A
    • uni1ECF
    • uni10FA
    • uni10DE
    • uni0491
    • uni044E
    • uni10E5
    • uni2D21
    • uni0269
    • uni0588
    • uni0493
    • s
    • ccedilla
    • o
    • uni044C
    • wcircumflex
    • uni10FF
    • uni10DA
    • uni2D04
    • uni043A
    • uni10D2
    • uni2D19
    • wacute
    • scircumflex
    • uni2D0F
    • uni04C8
    • uni01ED
    • uni10F9
    • uni048B
    • uni2D16
    • uni10EC
    • uni04F9
    • uni2D1B
    • uni2D2D
    • uni04DD
    • uni1ECD
    • ccaron
    • uni04D9
    • uni0254
    • uni10F0
    • uni023C
    • uni044B
    • uni1E53
    • uni2D10
    • uni04A9
    • uni045D
    • uni0585
    • uni2D07
    • uni10D3
    • uni1E51
    • uni2D18
    • uni0473
    • uni1EDB
    • uni2D1D
    • uni10EA
    • uni2D0C
    • uni0436
    • uni2D01
    • uni04AD
    • uni045A
    • scaron
    • uni03D9
    • oslash
    • uni0525
    • uni10D9
    • uni04E3
    • uni04CA
    • uni043F
    • uni10EE
    • uni0511
    • ocircumflex
    • uni0497
    • uni10D6
    • uni10D7
    • uni1EDF
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D05
    • wdieresis
    • uni10DB
    • kappa
    • uni03FC
    • uni04ED
    • uni04AB
    • uni10D5
    • sacute
    • uni0432
    • uni049D
    • uni0259
    • uni10E1
    • uni10F4
    • uni2D11
    • uni2D12
    • uni04FD
    • uni2D13
    • uni0560
    • uni0445
    • mu
    • uniFB03
    • uni04B9
    • uni0373
    • uni10E8
    • uni049B
    • uni10DD
    • uni2D1F
    • uni04B7
    • zdotaccent
    • obreve
    • uni10F8
    • uni2D20
    • ograve
    • uni0455
    • uni0242
    • uni052F
    • c
    • uni10DF
    • uni10E9
    • w
    • uni0439
    • uni04A1
    • uni1ED9
    • uni0513
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1E50
    • uni10BD
    • uni10B5
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10C7
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1C94
    • uni1C92
    • uni1EC2
    • uni1CB8
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1CB3
    • uni10AE
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1CB1
    • uni10AD
    • uni10A3
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1E52
    • uni10BA
    • uni1C99
    • uni10A7
    • uni1E14
    • uni10A8
    • uni10A9
    • uni1CB9
    • uni10A0
    • uni10AA
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1CB0
    • uni10C5
    • uni10B4
    • uni10B1
    • uni1CA8
    • uni10B3
    • uni1E16
    • uni10A1
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1EA6
    • uni10C4
    • uni1C98
    • uni10C1
    • uni1CA9
    • uni10A2
    • uni1EC4
    • uni10CD
    • uni10A6
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10B9
    • Aringacute
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1CB4
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10AB
    • uni10B6
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1EB2
    • uni1CBD
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CA4
    • uni10A5
    • uni10AF
    • uni1C97
    • uni1C91
    • uni10BF
    • uni1C9F
    • uni01D9
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10B2
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1CAB
    • uni10C0
    • uni10B8
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10B7
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10AC
    • Omega
    • uni1C96
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10BC
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1C9D
    • uni10A4
    • uni1CA7
    • uni10C2
    • uni1CB5
    • uni10BB
    • uni1CAA
    • uni1C90
    • uni1CBE
    • uni1EB4
    • uni01D7
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1ED2
    • uni01DB
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni043D
    • uni10D2
    • obreve
    • uni10EA
    • uni04F9
    • uni2D1E
    • uni10DE
    • uni1ED3
    • uni045F
    • uni044E
    • uni04BF
    • uni1E91
    • v
    • uni0447
    • uni1ED1
    • uni2D11
    • wcircumflex
    • zcaron
    • uni0525
    • uni2D09
    • uni0275
    • uni1EDD
    • uni1E61
    • uni2D07
    • uni10D1
    • uni2D23
    • uniAB53
    • uni0445
    • uni0454
    • c
    • uni2D16
    • uni049B
    • uni10D0
    • uni10D7
    • uni10DD
    • uni2D25
    • uni10E5
    • uni045D
    • uni023C
    • uni04A1
    • uni10E7
    • uni0473
    • uni2D01
    • uni10EB
    • uni0261
    • cdotaccent
    • uni2D22
    • o
    • uni1ECF
    • uni0513
    • uni2D10
    • uni0254
    • uni0527
    • ccaron
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D0D
    • kappa
    • uni2D05
    • uni2D1F
    • uni10D9
    • uni10D3
    • uni2D2D
    • uni04BD
    • uni10F4
    • uni0437
    • ograve
    • uni043C
    • uni10FD
    • uni0499
    • uni2113
    • uniFB02
    • uni10E3
    • uni043A
    • uni0455
    • uni0242
    • uni044B
    • uni0441
    • uni2D04
    • uni1E63
    • uni0438
    • uni0459
    • uni04F7
    • uni04F5
    • uni10F8
    • uni0373
    • uni0448
    • uni044D
    • odieresis
    • uni2D21
    • uni04E3
    • uni04E9
    • uni04B9
    • uni1E51
    • uni1E95
    • uni2D13
    • z
    • uni04FD
    • uni2D0A
    • uni10DA
    • uniFB00
    • uni10EE
    • uni04A7
    • uni04C6
    • uni0436
    • uni10D6
    • uni10EF
    • wgrave
    • uni10FE
    • uni0442
    • uni025B
    • uni04DD
    • uni0251
    • uni1ECD
    • uni043F
    • uni1ED7
    • uni049D
    • w
    • uni2D24
    • uni10E9
    • uni0491
    • uni2D0F
    • uni0560
    • uni10EC
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni04DB
    • uni2D12
    • uni1ED5
    • uni10DB
    • uni04CE
    • uni10F6
    • uni044F
    • uni10F3
    • uni04E7
    • ocircumflex
    • uni2D06
    • uni2D1A
    • uniFB04
    • ccircumflex
    • uni10E8
    • uni04AB
    • uni03D9
    • uni0529
    • omicrontonos
    • uni04CC
    • ccedilla
    • uni2D20
    • uni0588
    • uni0433
    • ohorn
    • sacute
    • uni044A
    • uni04C8
    • uni10F5
    • uni10F1
    • uni048B
    • uni043E
    • uni10F0
    • uni03D7
    • uni03FC
    • uni045A
    • scircumflex
    • uni04AD
    • uni0511
    • uni04A5
    • uni10DF
    • wacute
    • omicron
    • uni1ED9
    • uni0585
    • uniFB01
    • uni10DC
    • uni2D17
    • scedilla
    • uni10E1
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0497
    • uni10F7
    • uni2D15
    • uni04FB
    • uni04D9
    • s
    • uni1EE3
    • uni04DF
    • uni1EDB
    • uni2D1C
    • uni045C
    • uni04B5
    • uni0259
    • uni10E0
    • uni0495
    • uni026A
    • uni10ED
    • uni052F
    • uni043B
    • uni2D02
    • uni0453
    • uni04FF
    • uni2D18
    • uni10F9
    • uni01D2
    • uni10D8
    • otilde
    • uni04C2
    • uni0475
    • uni10D4
    • uni01EB
    • oslashacute
    • cacute
    • uni2D14
    • uni1E93
    • uni044C
    • scaron
    • zacute
    • uni0269
    • uni0449
    • uni0434
    • uni10FA
    • uni04ED
    • uni10E6
    • uni0439
    • uni2D19
    • x
    • uni10E2
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni04EB
    • uni0493
    • uni04A9
    • oslash
    • oacute
    • uni2D0B
    • uniFB03
    • uni1EDF
    • uni04E5
    • uni01ED
    • mu
    • uni0446
    • uni10D5
    • uni028A
    • uni04B7
    • uni051D
    • uni1E53
    • uni2D27
    • uni10FF
    • uni1EE1
    • omacron
    • uni046B
    • uni2D00
    • uni04A3
    • uni10F2
    • uni04C4
    • wdieresis
    • uni04B3
    • uni2D1D
    • zdotaccent
    • uni2D0C
    • uni0219
    • uni0432
    • uni04CA
    • uni10E4
    • uni2D08
    • uni2D1B
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CAF
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10A1
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1C99
    • uni10C2
    • uni01DB
    • uni1C9E
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1C97
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1EB0
    • uni10C4
    • uni1ED4
    • uni1C9F
    • uni10B2
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1E16
    • uni10A7
    • uni10B3
    • uni1C98
    • uni10B0
    • uni10AD
    • uni10B1
    • uni10B5
    • uni10C0
    • uni10B8
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10AB
    • uni10AE
    • uni10C1
    • uni1C95
    • uni1E52
    • uni1C94
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1CBE
    • uni01D9
    • uni10B4
    • uni10C3
    • uni10B7
    • uni1CAA
    • uni01D7
    • uni1CB9
    • uni10A9
    • uni10B9
    • uni10A3
    • uni1CA5
    • uni10A5
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10BA
    • uni1C96
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1CAD
    • uni10A6
    • uni1EB2
    • uni10A8
    • uni1CB1
    • uni10AC
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1C90
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1E14
    • uni10A4
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10AF
    • uni1CAC
    • uni10BD
    • uni1CA8
    • Omega
    • uni1ED6
    • uni10BC
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10A2
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1CB5
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1ED2
    • uni10AA
    • uni1CA7
    • uni10CD
    • uni1E50
    • uni10BB
    • uni10A0
    • uni10C7
    • uni10C5
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1CAB
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CBD
    • Aringacute
    • uni1C91
    • uni10B6
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1C92
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni2D27
    • uni2D05
    • uni03D7
    • wcircumflex
    • uni026A
    • uni2D15
    • uni2D04
    • uni045C
    • wacute
    • uni0475
    • uni2D06
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uniFB00
    • uni1ED7
    • uni10E2
    • uni04F9
    • ohorn
    • uni04B7
    • oacute
    • uni04BD
    • uni10F2
    • cacute
    • uni0513
    • omicrontonos
    • uni10E7
    • uni0493
    • uniFB03
    • ccedilla
    • uni2D16
    • uni2D18
    • uni10D7
    • uni044C
    • uni1ED1
    • obreve
    • uni2D1F
    • otilde
    • uni04A7
    • uniFB02
    • uni04C2
    • uni0455
    • uni04E7
    • uni0499
    • uni2D03
    • wgrave
    • uni04E9
    • uni04FF
    • ccaron
    • uni043D
    • uni0588
    • uni1ECD
    • uni04A5
    • uni0251
    • uni044F
    • uni04DB
    • uni1E53
    • ccircumflex
    • uni2D24
    • zacute
    • omacron
    • uni2D0A
    • uni0525
    • uni044B
    • uni2D0D
    • zcaron
    • uni1ED9
    • uni0261
    • uni043C
    • uni0373
    • uni0436
    • uni2D0B
    • uni2D10
    • uni1E63
    • uni0438
    • ograve
    • o
    • mu
    • uni2D13
    • uni2D1C
    • uni04B9
    • s
    • uni03FC
    • uni0441
    • uni045F
    • uni0454
    • uni10E9
    • uni1E61
    • uni1EDF
    • scaron
    • uni10DF
    • uni04C8
    • uni10F4
    • uni023C
    • uni028A
    • uni043E
    • uni04AB
    • uni04ED
    • uni10F7
    • uni2D1E
    • uni049B
    • uni2D1B
    • uni10FF
    • uni2D21
    • uni0437
    • uni10FA
    • uni10EC
    • uni2D07
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D09
    • uni04CE
    • uni10E0
    • uni1ED5
    • uni10DC
    • uni0497
    • uni10E4
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0495
    • uni1EDD
    • uni0242
    • uni0269
    • uni1E93
    • uni048B
    • uni10EA
    • z
    • uni04F5
    • uni10D1
    • uni045D
    • uni0527
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni052F
    • uni0442
    • uni10FE
    • uni04AD
    • uni10DB
    • c
    • uni04F7
    • uni10F3
    • uni1ED3
    • uni04A9
    • uni04BF
    • uni10DA
    • uni1E95
    • uni10D9
    • uni2D23
    • scircumflex
    • uni2D1A
    • uni10F0
    • uni10E6
    • uni0459
    • uni044D
    • uni0445
    • uni01ED
    • uni10D3
    • uni0529
    • uni10F5
    • uni10E3
    • uni051D
    • uni045A
    • uni0254
    • uni2D08
    • uni2D0F
    • uni10F1
    • zdotaccent
    • uni2D12
    • uni1ECF
    • uni2D25
    • uni03D9
    • uni2D0C
    • uni0511
    • odieresis
    • uni04E3
    • uni10EB
    • uni046B
    • uni10D4
    • uni2D14
    • uni2D20
    • uni2D22
    • uniFB01
    • oslash
    • uni0447
    • uni10EF
    • uni2D17
    • uni0219
    • uni0449
    • omicron
    • uni043B
    • uni2D1D
    • uni0453
    • uni10E5
    • x
    • w
    • uni0560
    • uni10FD
    • uni0275
    • uniFB04
    • uni044E
    • uni1EDB
    • uni04B3
    • uni04CA
    • uni10F6
    • uni1EE3
    • uni04FB
    • uni2D11
    • uni10D6
    • uni04FD
    • uni10D5
    • uni10D2
    • uni043A
    • uni1E51
    • uni10E1
    • uni0432
    • uni0433
    • uni10ED
    • uni04C4
    • uni10D0
    • uni049D
    • ocircumflex
    • uni10E8
    • uni2113
    • uni0259
    • uni04E5
    • uni0439
    • cdotaccent
    • uni2D00
    • wdieresis
    • uniAB53
    • uni043F
    • uni10DE
    • uni2D01
    • uni2D2D
    • uni0491
    • uni10EE
    • uni0585
    • uni04DD
    • uni0434
    • uni1E91
    • uni10F9
    • uni1EE1
    • kappa
    • uni04A3
    • uni10F8
    • uni04C6
    • uni01D2
    • uni0448
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D19
    • uni0446
    • v
    • uni044A
    • uni04DF
    • scedilla
    • uni04A1
    • uni10DD
    • uni04CC
    • uni025B
    • oslashacute
    • uni10D8
    • uni04D9
    • uni01EB
    • uni04EB
    • sacute
    • uni0473
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1EB2
    • uni10C5
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1E52
    • uni1EA6
    • uni10AC
    • uni10A2
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1CBF
    • uni10C7
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10AF
    • uni1C90
    • uni1C95
    • uni10A7
    • uni1CB5
    • Aringacute
    • uni10A5
    • uni10AA
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10BB
    • uni10BF
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1CB7
    • uni10A8
    • uni10B8
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1EA4
    • uni10B1
    • uni1E50
    • uni1ED4
    • uni1C97
    • uni10C4
    • uni10A0
    • uni1C9B
    • uni10BA
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1CB6
    • uni01D7
    • uni10C0
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1E14
    • uni10B6
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1C96
    • uni1C9C
    • uni10B2
    • uni10AB
    • uni10B3
    • uni10A9
    • uni1EC0
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1C9F
    • uni10AD
    • uni1E16
    • uni10B7
    • uni1ED2
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1CB9
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C9D
    • uni10C2
    • uni1CAA
    • uni1C98
    • uni1CA4
    • uni10BD
    • uni10B4
    • uni10A6
    • uni1EC2
    • uni1CA8
    • uni01D9
    • uni1C99
    • uni10B0
    • uni10A1
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10C1
    • uni1C9E
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1C92
    • uni1CBE
    • uni10A4
    • uni10AE
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1CA2
    • uni1CA5
    • uni10C3
    • uni10B9
    • uni10BE
    • uni1CB2
    • Omega
    • uni01DB
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1CB8
    • uni1C91
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1CBD
    • uni10B5
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1C94
    • uni1EC4
    • uni10BC
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • uni10DA
    • uni2D1A
    • uni2D19
    • uni10FF
    • uni0242
    • uni04AB
    • uni04BF
    • uni049B
    • uni04BD
    • wgrave
    • uni2D1D
    • uni0588
    • cdotaccent
    • uni2D05
    • uni10DE
    • ohorn
    • uni0499
    • uni044F
    • uni10EA
    • uni2D01
    • uni043A
    • uni10EB
    • uni044E
    • uni01ED
    • uni2D22
    • uni10E0
    • uni043B
    • uni045F
    • uni044A
    • uni048B
    • uni04E9
    • uni04F5
    • uni03D9
    • uni043F
    • uni051D
    • uni03FC
    • scircumflex
    • uni04E7
    • uni2D0D
    • uni0497
    • uni0449
    • uni0438
    • uni1E93
    • uni1ECD
    • uni044D
    • uni0560
    • uni2D1F
    • uni028A
    • uni2D1C
    • v
    • uni10D0
    • uni0261
    • uni10D5
    • uni0373
    • uni04C6
    • uni2D10
    • uni04B7
    • uni2D0B
    • uni04CE
    • uni04C8
    • uni04D9
    • uni04F7
    • uni2D00
    • uni0525
    • uni10D9
    • kappa
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni043E
    • uni2D11
    • uni2D12
    • uni04FB
    • uni2D14
    • uni2D17
    • uni2D21
    • ocircumflex
    • uni1ED1
    • uni025B
    • uni2D0C
    • uni2D24
    • uni0473
    • uni10FA
    • uni049D
    • uni04FD
    • uni0585
    • uni10E6
    • uni1EE1
    • uni1EE3
    • zdotaccent
    • uni04C4
    • ccircumflex
    • uni0447
    • uni046B
    • uni04A9
    • w
    • cacute
    • uni10D2
    • uni0441
    • uni0433
    • uni01EB
    • uni1ED3
    • wdieresis
    • uni044B
    • uni0513
    • uni10E4
    • uni04E5
    • uni2113
    • uni2D07
    • uni2D18
    • uni2D2D
    • uni2D1B
    • uni045C
    • omicrontonos
    • uni03D7
    • uni1ECF
    • scedilla
    • uniFB03
    • uni1E63
    • uni2D04
    • ograve
    • uni0493
    • uni10EF
    • uni10D4
    • uni04A1
    • uni04B9
    • uni0511
    • uni026A
    • uni10D6
    • uni0475
    • uni1ED9
    • uni10E1
    • zcaron
    • uni10E8
    • uni2D20
    • uni0434
    • uni04CA
    • uni10DD
    • uni10F9
    • x
    • uni0259
    • uni0446
    • uni1EDB
    • sacute
    • z
    • uni04EB
    • uni10E3
    • uni0445
    • uni10DB
    • uni045D
    • uni1E51
    • uni044C
    • uni0495
    • c
    • uni2D16
    • uni0251
    • uni0275
    • uni0491
    • uni10F6
    • uni0529
    • uni10E5
    • uniAB53
    • uni1E95
    • uni04ED
    • uni2D1E
    • oslashacute
    • uni10EC
    • uni10F5
    • oslash
    • uni10EE
    • uni10F3
    • uni2D23
    • obreve
    • uni04DF
    • uni10F7
    • uni1E61
    • zacute
    • wcircumflex
    • uni0219
    • uni04A7
    • uni0448
    • uni2D08
    • uni1E91
    • o
    • uni2D13
    • wacute
    • uni0454
    • uni2D02
    • oacute
    • uni2D0A
    • uni045A
    • uni10FE
    • omacron
    • uni0436
    • mu
    • uni10F8
    • uni04B5
    • uni2D09
    • uni052F
    • uni10F2
    • uni2D27
    • uni10F0
    • s
    • uni04DB
    • uni2D0F
    • uni10E2
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D15
    • uni023C
    • uni10D7
    • uni10ED
    • uniFB01
    • uni0439
    • uni0442
    • uni04AD
    • uni04F9
    • ccaron
    • uni10D1
    • uni10E9
    • uni10F4
    • uniFB02
    • odieresis
    • otilde
    • uni0437
    • uni0254
    • uni0432
    • uni0459
    • uni10FD
    • uni043C
    • uni10D8
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni01D2
    • uni04DD
    • uni0527
    • uni10DC
    • uni0455
    • uni1EDD
    • uni2D0E
    • uni10E7
    • uni043D
    • uni04A3
    • scaron
    • ccedilla
    • uni1ED5
    • uni2D25
    • uni1E53
    • uni04A5
    • uni1EDF
    • uni04B3
    • uni0269
    • uni10DF
    • uni1ED7
    • uni2D06
    • uni04FF
    • uniFB00
    • uni04C2
    • omicron
    • uni10D3
    • uniFB04
    • uni0453
    • uni04E3
    • uni04CC
    • uni10F1
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1EAA
    • uni1CAF
    • uni10A1
    • uni10AE
    • uni10B3
    • uni1CBE
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1EB2
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1E52
    • uni10BD
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1CB8
    • uni10C2
    • uni10BE
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1CAA
    • uni1CB5
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1CA1
    • uni1CA7
    • uni10B4
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10A8
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1CA9
    • uni1C9E
    • uni1C96
    • uni01D9
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1C94
    • uni1C91
    • uni10C4
    • uni10AA
    • uni1EC0
    • uni10B8
    • uni1C9C
    • uni10B2
    • uni10B5
    • uni1EA4
    • Omega
    • uni10A7
    • uni1C99
    • uni10B1
    • uni10A2
    • uni1CA2
    • uni10AB
    • uni1E16
    • uni10BB
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1C97
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CB2
    • uni10A3
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10AF
    • uni1C9B
    • uni10A9
    • uni1CAD
    • uni01DB
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1C98
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1CBF
    • uni10B6
    • uni10C0
    • uni1C90
    • uni1EA8
    • uni10AD
    • Aringacute
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1ED2
    • uni10B0
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1C92
    • uni1CBD
    • uni1E50
    • uni10BA
    • uni1EB4
    • uni10A6
    • uni10A0
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10C7
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10C1
    • uni10B7
    • uni10C5
    • uni10B9
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1E14
    • uni1CA5
    • uni01D7
    • uni10CD
    • uni1CA6
    • uni10A4
    • uni10A5
    • uni10AC
    • uni1CB7
    • uni10BC
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • scircumflex
    • uni10D7
    • uni10DF
    • uni045A
    • uni04C4
    • oacute
    • uni0455
    • uni1ECD
    • uni10E6
    • uni0511
    • uni1ED9
    • uni044D
    • uni2D11
    • uni0513
    • uniFB03
    • uniFB00
    • wcircumflex
    • uni10D3
    • uni026A
    • uni2D0D
    • uni10F7
    • uniFB02
    • uni2D14
    • uni10F8
    • uni10E0
    • uni046B
    • cacute
    • uni10E8
    • uni1ED7
    • uni1E93
    • uni045F
    • uni10E5
    • zacute
    • uni2D10
    • uni2D18
    • uni04A5
    • uni10E9
    • uni10DC
    • w
    • uni0495
    • uni04AB
    • uni049B
    • uni2D07
    • uni0585
    • uni043C
    • uni10F6
    • uni2D25
    • wdieresis
    • uni04B5
    • uni04DB
    • uni0219
    • uni04FD
    • uni043D
    • uni10E3
    • uni10FA
    • uni0447
    • uni1E95
    • uni2D1B
    • ocircumflex
    • uni0588
    • uni044C
    • uni0497
    • uni051D
    • uni0439
    • uni10D4
    • uni045C
    • uni10D6
    • uni2D09
    • uni2D1A
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni04BD
    • uni10F2
    • uni0454
    • o
    • uni044B
    • uni2D19
    • uni2D20
    • uni2D1C
    • uni0251
    • ccircumflex
    • uni10D0
    • uni01ED
    • uni2D01
    • odieresis
    • uni10EE
    • uni0529
    • uni1E91
    • uni10E7
    • uni10E2
    • uni043B
    • uni10F3
    • c
    • uni2D17
    • uni043E
    • uni04A3
    • uni044F
    • uni04B3
    • oslashacute
    • uni04CE
    • uni03FC
    • s
    • uni0261
    • uni10DE
    • uni10EB
    • uni2D23
    • uni0448
    • x
    • uni0446
    • uni1EDD
    • uni2D0C
    • uni04E9
    • zdotaccent
    • uni04A7
    • uni1ECF
    • uni0242
    • uni0491
    • otilde
    • uni2D15
    • uni2D1E
    • uni2D22
    • uni044E
    • uni0459
    • uni10FD
    • uni048B
    • uni03D7
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0475
    • ccaron
    • uni0269
    • uni0473
    • uni04EB
    • uni10ED
    • uni04B9
    • uni049D
    • uni04A1
    • uni04A9
    • uni04B7
    • uni10DD
    • omicron
    • uni0442
    • uni043A
    • uni052F
    • uni0499
    • uni04F9
    • uni04AD
    • uni045D
    • uni04CC
    • uni04E5
    • uni2D27
    • uni0493
    • uni04C2
    • uni10D9
    • uni04BF
    • uni04C8
    • omicrontonos
    • uni10F0
    • zcaron
    • wgrave
    • uni1EDF
    • uni10D2
    • uni10EA
    • uni10EC
    • uni1ED5
    • uni2D05
    • v
    • uni10D8
    • uniFB01
    • uni04E7
    • sacute
    • uni10D1
    • uni10D5
    • uni04DD
    • uni0560
    • uni0449
    • oslash
    • uni1E51
    • uni2D24
    • uni10F9
    • ohorn
    • uni03D9
    • uni1ED1
    • uni1E63
    • uni2D0A
    • uni0259
    • ccedilla
    • uni10F4
    • cdotaccent
    • uni0434
    • uni1EE3
    • uni025B
    • uni0432
    • uni2D16
    • uni0441
    • uni2D06
    • uni0437
    • uni2D1F
    • ograve
    • uni0438
    • z
    • uni2D0B
    • uni2D13
    • uni0373
    • uni043F
    • wacute
    • uni10F5
    • uni1E53
    • mu
    • uni1ED3
    • uni028A
    • uni2D08
    • uniFB04
    • uni2D00
    • uni0254
    • uni2D04
    • omacron
    • uni10E4
    • uni04D9
    • uni2D21
    • uni0433
    • scaron
    • uni04DF
    • uni04FB
    • uni023C
    • uni01EB
    • uni04CA
    • uni10EF
    • uni1E61
    • uni2D12
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni1EE1
    • uni10FF
    • uni2D0F
    • uni04FF
    • uni10F1
    • uniAB53
    • uni10E1
    • uni0445
    • uni0525
    • uni2113
    • uni01D2
    • obreve
    • uni2D03
    • uni2D1D
    • uni04E3
    • uni04F7
    • uni10FE
    • uni04F5
    • uni2D2D
    • uni1EDB
    • uni0275
    • uni0436
    • scedilla
    • uni10DA
    • uni044A
    • uni04ED
    • uni0527
    • uni0453
    • kappa
    • uni04C6
    • uni10DB
    • uni2D02
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CA2
    • uni1C94
    • uni1C96
    • uni1CAF
    • uni10A9
    • uni1CAA
    • uni1CB5
    • uni10B7
    • uni1EB2
    • uni10B4
    • uni10A0
    • uni1CBD
    • uni1CA7
    • uni10C1
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1CB8
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1E16
    • uni10B3
    • uni1E14
    • uni1ED6
    • uni10A3
    • uni1C98
    • uni10BD
    • uni1CA0
    • uni1CA9
    • uni10C4
    • uni1CBA
    • uni10B9
    • uni10A2
    • uni1C9C
    • Aringacute
    • uni10BC
    • uni1CA3
    • uni10A4
    • uni01DB
    • uni1ED2
    • uni10A5
    • uni1CA1
    • uni01D9
    • uni10B2
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10B1
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10AF
    • uni01D7
    • uni1CAD
    • uni10C7
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1C91
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1EC0
    • uni10B6
    • uni1C90
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1C9B
    • uni10A7
    • uni10BB
    • uni10B5
    • uni1EC2
    • uni1CB6
    • uni10CD
    • uni1C95
    • uni10A8
    • uni10A1
    • uni1C93
    • uni10BF
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1C9A
    • uni1C92
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10AB
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1CAC
    • uni10C0
    • uni1CB0
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CA6
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1C99
    • uni10C5
    • uni1ED4
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10C2
    • uni10AC
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1EBE
    • uni10B8
    • uni10A6
    • uni1EB4
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CBE
    • uni1C97
    • uni1E52
    • Omega
    • uni10BE
    • uni10BA
    • uni10AE
    • uni10AD
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1EA4
    • uni10AA
    • uni1E50
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1CBF
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • otilde
    • uni10D5
    • uni10FA
    • uni1E91
    • uni04BF
    • uniFB02
    • uni04C6
    • uni023C
    • uni0495
    • uni10E4
    • uni0448
    • uni1EDB
    • uni01D2
    • uni1EE3
    • uni044A
    • uni2D18
    • uni1ED3
    • uni2113
    • uniFB00
    • v
    • uni2D0D
    • uni2D11
    • uni043E
    • ocircumflex
    • uni04ED
    • uni0475
    • uni0436
    • uni01EB
    • uni0527
    • wacute
    • odieresis
    • cacute
    • uni044F
    • uni0491
    • uni04FD
    • uni10D8
    • uni10F6
    • uni2D25
    • uni0433
    • uni045D
    • z
    • uni10EE
    • wcircumflex
    • uni1EDF
    • uni2D19
    • uni04AD
    • uni0455
    • uni0493
    • uni10F0
    • uni2D0C
    • sacute
    • uni2D20
    • uni1ECD
    • uni04C8
    • uni10E6
    • uni043B
    • uni2D04
    • uni0442
    • uni10D7
    • uni0434
    • oslashacute
    • uni10FF
    • uni1EDD
    • uni10F7
    • scedilla
    • uni044B
    • uni10DD
    • uni10F9
    • uni2D21
    • uni2D06
    • uni0445
    • uni0513
    • uni0439
    • uni0449
    • uni04E7
    • uni051D
    • ohorn
    • uni04E3
    • uni1E63
    • uni0269
    • uni04A1
    • uni10E2
    • omacron
    • scircumflex
    • uni10D4
    • uni10E3
    • uni045C
    • uni2D1D
    • uni10E8
    • uni0511
    • uni0453
    • uni01ED
    • uni0459
    • uni0529
    • uni043D
    • uni1ED5
    • uni04A5
    • uni2D00
    • uni043F
    • uni04B5
    • uni10F1
    • uni10E7
    • w
    • uni04CE
    • uni10E1
    • uni10DE
    • uni10DF
    • scaron
    • uni0525
    • uni2D1C
    • uni10F2
    • uni046B
    • uni2D09
    • uni1ED9
    • uni026A
    • ccircumflex
    • uni04BD
    • uni0588
    • uni2D15
    • uni10EF
    • x
    • uni2D24
    • uni0242
    • uni04DD
    • uni1E95
    • uni2D13
    • uni0251
    • uni04FF
    • uni044C
    • uni10FD
    • uni04EB
    • c
    • uni044D
    • uni045A
    • uni2D10
    • uni2D23
    • ccedilla
    • uni04FB
    • ccaron
    • uni043C
    • uni1EE1
    • zdotaccent
    • uni1E51
    • uni2D1B
    • uni2D0B
    • uni0437
    • uni1E61
    • uni1ED7
    • oacute
    • uni0261
    • uni2D1A
    • uni049B
    • uni04AB
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0585
    • uni10ED
    • uni04B9
    • uni03FC
    • uni0275
    • uni10DB
    • uni2D03
    • uni043A
    • uni04C2
    • uni04D9
    • s
    • uni1ECF
    • uni0499
    • uni2D0F
    • wdieresis
    • uni04DF
    • o
    • zcaron
    • uni2D08
    • uni2D22
    • uni0373
    • oslash
    • ograve
    • zacute
    • uni04A9
    • uni10DA
    • uni03D9
    • uniFB03
    • uni04A7
    • uni0441
    • wgrave
    • uni028A
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni0473
    • omicron
    • uni04DB
    • uni04C4
    • obreve
    • uni1ED1
    • uni10E0
    • uni2D2D
    • uni04A3
    • uni0438
    • cdotaccent
    • uni04F5
    • uni2D27
    • uni04CC
    • uni10D1
    • uni10EC
    • uni10FE
    • uniFB04
    • uni2D1E
    • uni10F8
    • uni045F
    • uni0446
    • uni10EA
    • uni10D3
    • uni10EB
    • uni03D7
    • uni0219
    • uni10DC
    • uni025B
    • uni2D05
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni0259
    • uni2D0A
    • uni04E5
    • uni04B3
    • uni10F4
    • uni2D12
    • uni0560
    • uni048B
    • uni04B7
    • mu
    • uni04CA
    • uni10D2
    • uni10F3
    • uni2D07
    • uniFB01
    • kappa
    • uni10E5
    • uni10F5
    • uni1E53
    • uni04F9
    • uni10E9
    • uni04E9
    • uni2D17
    • uni10D0
    • uni10D6
    • uni0454
    • uni2D16
    • uni049D
    • uni0432
    • uni052F
    • uni044E
    • uniAB53
    • uni0254
    • uni04F7
    • uni0497
    • omicrontonos
    • uni2D1F
    • uni0447
    • uni2D01
    • uni2D14
    • uni2D02
    • uni10D9
    • uni1E93
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni1CAA
    • uni1CB0
    • uni1EBE
    • uni1CA0
    • uni10C0
    • uni10C7
    • uni1CAE
    • uni10A6
    • uni10B2
    • uni10BC
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1CB4
    • uni10AE
    • uni10B8
    • uni1ED0
    • uni10B3
    • uni10BF
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1EAA
    • uni10A5
    • uni10A8
    • uni10A7
    • uni10A1
    • uni1CAD
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1ED4
    • uni10B9
    • uni1CA6
    • Aringacute
    • uni10BA
    • uni10B1
    • uni1CA1
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1CA9
    • uni01D9
    • uni1C9D
    • uni1C95
    • uni1CAC
    • uni1EC4
    • uni1CB7
    • uni1CB1
    • uni10C2
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1ED6
    • uni1C99
    • uni1CBF
    • uni1EC0
    • uni01DB
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1E14
    • uni1EAE
    • uni10AD
    • uni10BE
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1C93
    • uni10BD
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1C91
    • uni1ED2
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1C94
    • uni1E50
    • uni10B4
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1E16
    • uni10B6
    • uni1EB2
    • uni10A2
    • Omega
    • uni1C90
    • uni1CBE
    • uni1CA3
    • uni1CB8
    • uni1CB5
    • uni10CD
    • uni10BB
    • uni1C92
    • uni1CB2
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CB6
    • uni1EA4
    • uni10AA
    • uni10AB
    • uni10B5
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10A0
    • uni01D7
    • uni1EB4
    • uni10C4
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1CBA
    • uni10A9
    • uni10B7
    • uni10AF
    • uni10C5
    • uni1E52
    • uni1C96
    • uni1EC2
    • uni1CAB
    • uni1CA2
    • uni10C1
    • uni1C9F
    • uni1C98
    • uni10A3
    • uni10A4
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10AC
    • uni1CBD
    • uni1C97
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in smcp substitutions:

    • sacute
    • uni0473
    • uni10D9
    • uni04FB
    • mu
    • uni04AB
    • uni04F9
    • uni2D1B
    • ocircumflex
    • uni0495
    • uni1EE3
    • uni1ED7
    • c
    • uni10DB
    • uni03D7
    • uni044A
    • uni10DD
    • oslash
    • uni10D7
    • uni2D14
    • uni043D
    • uni0491
    • uni2D13
    • uni01EB
    • uni0448
    • uni10F5
    • uni0585
    • uni10F3
    • uni04DD
    • uni051D
    • uni0499
    • uni052F
    • uni10F1
    • uni10EA
    • uni10F2
    • uni0433
    • uni2D0A
    • uni04DB
    • uni10DF
    • uni10EE
    • ograve
    • uni1E91
    • uni026A
    • uni2D10
    • uni2D09
    • cdotaccent
    • uni01ED
    • ohorn
    • uni2D1D
    • uni10ED
    • uni045F
    • uni046B
    • uni1ECD
    • uni10FF
    • uni10E1
    • uni0446
    • uni1E51
    • uni10E9
    • zdotaccent
    • uni045C
    • uni03D9
    • uni10E8
    • uni04C4
    • uni04DF
    • v
    • uni1ED9
    • uni0525
    • uni2D0E
    • uni0434
    • uni1ED1
    • uni043B
    • w
    • uni0269
    • uni2D0C
    • wgrave
    • uni04C2
    • uni0254
    • uni10D5
    • uni2D02
    • uni2D04
    • uni044C
    • uni04E3
    • uni10EB
    • uni1E93
    • uni0453
    • uni1ED3
    • uni2D23
    • ccircumflex
    • ohungarumlaut
    • uni0497
    • uni0449
    • uni04F7
    • uni04AD
    • uni2D07
    • uni10D6
    • uni2D2D
    • uni2D20
    • cacute
    • x
    • uni1EE1
    • uni04A3
    • uni10FA
    • uni04FD
    • uni10E3
    • uni0527
    • uni04EB
    • uni025B
    • uni045A
    • uni2D0D
    • uni10F6
    • uni10D1
    • uni1E61
    • oacute
    • uni1ED5
    • uni04A9
    • uni04B5
    • uni10DC
    • uni2D0B
    • uni028A
    • uni10F7
    • uni2D17
    • uni049D
    • uniFB00
    • uni043E
    • uni0459
    • uni0455
    • uni2D27
    • uni2D25
    • scircumflex
    • uni0437
    • uni10E6
    • uni1EDD
    • uni2D1F
    • uni04C8
    • uni0529
    • uni044D
    • uni04B9
    • kappa
    • uni2D15
    • uni04A1
    • uni043C
    • uni0259
    • oslashacute
    • uni0219
    • uni04BD
    • uni0436
    • uni04E7
    • z
    • uni0373
    • uni2D08
    • uni04B7
    • uni2D0F
    • uni10EC
    • uni10F8
    • wacute
    • uni04B3
    • uni2D11
    • uni2D24
    • uni044B
    • uni0445
    • uni0242
    • uni1E95
    • uni1EDF
    • uniFB01
    • zcaron
    • wcircumflex
    • uni0275
    • uni04C6
    • uni10E7
    • uni10F0
    • uni0439
    • uni1EDB
    • uni045D
    • uni10D2
    • uni2D03
    • uni0251
    • uni04CC
    • uni0447
    • ccedilla
    • uni04A7
    • uni0513
    • ccaron
    • uni0438
    • uni2D12
    • uni10F4
    • uni04FF
    • uni2D1C
    • uni2D1E
    • uni03FC
    • otilde
    • wdieresis
    • uni2D00
    • uni10FE
    • uni10E2
    • uni04BF
    • obreve
    • uni0261
    • kgreenlandic
    • uni049B
    • uni04D9
    • uni2D21
    • uni0588
    • uni04A5
    • uni2D22
    • uni0442
    • uni0432
    • uni2D06
    • uniAB53
    • uni2D19
    • uniFB02
    • s
    • uni04E9
    • zacute
    • uni2D05
    • uni04CA
    • uni10D4
    • uni0454
    • uni2113
    • uni04F5
    • uni2D1A
    • uni10DE
    • uni044E
    • omacron
    • uni023C
    • uni04CE
    • uni0511
    • scaron
    • uni2D18
    • uni10F9
    • uni0441
    • uni10E0
    • uni1E53
    • uni04ED
    • uni0560
    • uni1E63
    • uni0493
    • odieresis
    • uni048B
    • uni10D8
    • uni10E4
    • uni043F
    • uni01D2
    • uni10FD
    • uni2D01
    • uni10E5
    • uni1ECF
    • scedilla
    • uni043A
    • uni10D0
    • uni10D3
    • uni10EF
    • omicron
    • o
    • uni2D16
    • uni044F
    • uni04E5
    • uniFB04
    • uni10DA
    • omicrontonos
    • uni0475
    • uniFB03
    [code: missing-smcp-lowercase]
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    The following letters did not take part in c2sc substitutions:

    • uni10BF
    • uni1C96
    • uni10AF
    • uni10A0
    • uni1CBD
    • uni10A5
    • uni10AB
    • uni1C93
    • uni1CA5
    • uni1C9F
    • uni10B3
    • uni1CAF
    • uni1E52
    • Aringacute
    • uni1CA4
    • uni1ED6
    • uni10B8
    • uni1CAD
    • uni10C3
    • uni1CB7
    • uni10B7
    • uni1CBF
    • uni10AA
    • uni1CA6
    • uni10BE
    • uni10B0
    • uni1CAB
    • uni10A1
    • uni1C92
    • uni1C98
    • uni1EB0
    • uni1EA4
    • uni1CB0
    • uni10A2
    • uni1C9B
    • uni1C91
    • uni1EBE
    • uni10A7
    • uni1E50
    • uni1EC4
    • Omega
    • uni1C9A
    • uni10AD
    • uni1CA0
    • uni10C2
    • uni1CB2
    • uni1C90
    • uni1CB4
    • uni01D7
    • uni10BC
    • uni1EAA
    • uni1CA2
    • uni10C7
    • uni10A4
    • uni1EC0
    • uni10C0
    • uni1ED2
    • uni10A8
    • uni1CBE
    • uni10A9
    • uni10A3
    • uni10B9
    • uni1CB6
    • uni1CA3
    • uni10AE
    • uni10B5
    • uni1CAA
    • uni01D9
    • uni10CD
    • uni1C9E
    • uni10B4
    • uni1C99
    • uni1C97
    • uni1EB2
    • uni1C94
    • uni10BA
    • uni10C4
    • uni1C9C
    • uni1CA1
    • uni10B6
    • uni10BB
    • uni10BD
    • uni1C95
    • uni1E14
    • uni10C5
    • uni1EAE
    • uni1ED4
    • uni1EA8
    • uni1CB1
    • uni1EB4
    • uni1ED0
    • uni1E16
    • uni10AC
    • uni1CAE
    • uni1CBA
    • uni1CB5
    • uni1C9D
    • uni10C1
    • uni10B1
    • uni1CA8
    • uni1CB3
    • uni1EA6
    • uni1CB9
    • uni1CA7
    • uni1CB8
    • uni01DB
    • uni1EC2
    • uni10A6
    • uni1CAC
    • uni10B2
    • uni1CA9
    [code: missing-c2sc-uppercase]

Metadata Checks

Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.

Check ID: googlefonts/metadata/unreachable_subsetting
โš ๏ธ ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSans-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    fonts/ttf/MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf: The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, yi
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding one of: yi, canadian-aboriginal
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding one of: syriac, duployan
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: osage, cherokee
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+030D COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE: try adding sunuwar
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: try adding math
    • U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, todhri
    • U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT: try adding math
    • U+0324 COMBINING DIAERESIS BELOW: try adding one of: syriac, cherokee, duployan
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: try adding math
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: try adding math
    • U+032E COMBINING BREVE BELOW: try adding syriac
    • U+0332 COMBINING LOW LINE: try adding math
    • U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT: try adding osage
    • U+05BE HEBREW PUNCTUATION MAQAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05C3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION SOF PASUQ: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D0 HEBREW LETTER ALEF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D1 HEBREW LETTER BET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D2 HEBREW LETTER GIMEL: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D3 HEBREW LETTER DALET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D4 HEBREW LETTER HE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D5 HEBREW LETTER VAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D6 HEBREW LETTER ZAYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D7 HEBREW LETTER HET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D8 HEBREW LETTER TET: try adding hebrew
    • U+05D9 HEBREW LETTER YOD: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DA HEBREW LETTER FINAL KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DB HEBREW LETTER KAF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DC HEBREW LETTER LAMED: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DD HEBREW LETTER FINAL MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DE HEBREW LETTER MEM: try adding hebrew
    • U+05DF HEBREW LETTER FINAL NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E0 HEBREW LETTER NUN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E1 HEBREW LETTER SAMEKH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E2 HEBREW LETTER AYIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E3 HEBREW LETTER FINAL PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E4 HEBREW LETTER PE: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E5 HEBREW LETTER FINAL TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E6 HEBREW LETTER TSADI: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E7 HEBREW LETTER QOF: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E8 HEBREW LETTER RESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05E9 HEBREW LETTER SHIN: try adding hebrew
    • U+05EA HEBREW LETTER TAV: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F3 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERESH: try adding hebrew
    • U+05F4 HEBREW PUNCTUATION GERSHAYIM: try adding hebrew
    • U+0E3F THAI CURRENCY SYMBOL BAHT: try adding thai
    • U+2000 EN QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2001 EM QUAD: try adding symbols2
    • U+2003 EM SPACE: try adding nushu
    • U+2007 FIGURE SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2008 PUNCTUATION SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+200A HAIR SPACE: try adding symbols2
    • U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN: try adding one of: yi, arabic, syloti-nagri
    • U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR: try adding adlam
    • U+2016 DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE: try adding math
    • U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: try adding adlam
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2074 SUPERSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+207A SUPERSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207B SUPERSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+207C SUPERSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+207D SUPERSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207E SUPERSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+207F SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N: try adding math
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: try adding math
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: try adding math
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: try adding math
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: try adding math
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: try adding math
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: try adding math
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: try adding math
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: try adding math
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: try adding math
    • U+208A SUBSCRIPT PLUS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208B SUBSCRIPT MINUS: try adding math
    • U+208C SUBSCRIPT EQUALS SIGN: try adding math
    • U+208D SUBSCRIPT LEFT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+208E SUBSCRIPT RIGHT PARENTHESIS: try adding math
    • U+2105 CARE OF: try adding math
    • U+2117 SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT: try adding math
    • U+2120 SERVICE MARK: try adding math
    • U+2126 OHM SIGN: try adding math
    • U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: try adding math
    • U+2144 TURNED SANS-SERIF CAPITAL Y: try adding math
    • U+2153 VULGAR FRACTION ONE THIRD: try adding symbols
    • U+2154 VULGAR FRACTION TWO THIRDS: try adding symbols
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: try adding symbols
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: try adding symbols
    • U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2194 LEFT RIGHT ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2195 UP DOWN ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2196 NORTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2197 NORTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2198 SOUTH EAST ARROW: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+2199 SOUTH WEST ARROW: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: try adding math
    • U+2205 EMPTY SET: try adding math
    • U+2206 INCREMENT: try adding math
    • U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: try adding math
    • U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: try adding math
    • U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding one of: tai-tham, math, yi, symbols
    • U+221A SQUARE ROOT: try adding math
    • U+221E INFINITY: try adding math
    • U+222B INTEGRAL: try adding math
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+23CF EJECT SYMBOL: try adding symbols
    • U+23E9 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23EA BLACK LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+23F8 DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR: try adding symbols
    • U+23F9 BLACK SQUARE FOR STOP: try adding symbols
    • U+23FA BLACK CIRCLE FOR RECORD: try adding symbols
    • U+24B9 CIRCLED LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D: try adding symbols
    • U+25A0 BLACK SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25A1 WHITE SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AA BLACK SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25AB WHITE SMALL SQUARE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B2 BLACK UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B3 WHITE UP-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B4 BLACK UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B5 WHITE UP-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B6 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B7 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25B8 BLACK RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25B9 WHITE RIGHT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BC BLACK DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BD WHITE DOWN-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25BE BLACK DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25BF WHITE DOWN-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C0 BLACK LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C1 WHITE LEFT-POINTING TRIANGLE: try adding one of: symbols, math
    • U+25C2 BLACK LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C3 WHITE LEFT-POINTING SMALL TRIANGLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25C6 BLACK DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: try adding symbols
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols
    • U+25CB WHITE CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25CF BLACK CIRCLE: try adding symbols
    • U+25E6 WHITE BULLET: try adding symbols
    • U+2660 BLACK SPADE SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2663 BLACK CLUB SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2665 BLACK HEART SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+2666 BLACK DIAMOND SUIT: try adding symbols
    • U+27E8 MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+27E9 MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET: try adding math
    • U+FB29 HEBREW LETTER ALTERNATIVE PLUS SIGN: try adding hebrew

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: armenian, cyrillic-ext, cyrillic, georgian, greek, latin-ext, latin, lisu, tifinagh, vietnamese

    [code: unreachable-subsetting]

Glyphset Checks

Shapes languages in all GF glyphsets.

Check ID: googlefonts/glyphsets/shape_languages
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว' and shaping the text 'ว' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤก' and shaping the text 'ฤก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to aogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ…ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to eogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ™ฬƒ'
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬ'
    Shaper didn't attach tildecomb to uogonek.sc when shaping the text 'ลณฬƒ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to eacute.sc when shaping the text 'รฉฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to egrave.sc when shaping the text 'รจฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecircumflex.sc when shaping the text 'รชฬฉ'
    Shaper didn't attach uni0329 to ecaron.sc when shaping the text 'ฤ›ฬฉ'
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฃ' and shaping the text 'แบฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบก' and shaping the text 'แบก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฑ' and shaping the text 'แบฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบณ' and shaping the text 'แบณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบต' and shaping the text 'แบต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฏ' and shaping the text 'แบฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบท' and shaping the text 'แบท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบง' and shaping the text 'แบง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฉ' and shaping the text 'แบฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบซ' and shaping the text 'แบซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฅ' and shaping the text 'แบฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบญ' and shaping the text 'แบญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบป' and shaping the text 'แบป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปƒ' and shaping the text 'แปƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป…' and shaping the text 'แป…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฟ' and shaping the text 'แบฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‡' and shaping the text 'แป‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‰' and shaping the text 'แป‰' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปง' and shaping the text 'แปง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦฐ' and shaping the text 'ฦฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปซ' and shaping the text 'แปซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปญ' and shaping the text 'แปญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฏ' and shaping the text 'แปฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฉ' and shaping the text 'แปฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฑ' and shaping the text 'แปฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปท' and shaping the text 'แปท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปน' and shaping the text 'แปน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปต' and shaping the text 'แปต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบฝ' and shaping the text 'แบฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฉ' and shaping the text 'ฤฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฉ' and shaping the text 'ลฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤณ' and shaping the text 'ฤณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปณ' and shaping the text 'แปณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลท' and shaping the text 'ลท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว”' and shaping the text 'ว”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วŽ' and shaping the text 'วŽ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฟ' and shaping the text 'ลฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ“' and shaping the text 'ษ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ—' and shaping the text 'ษ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦ™' and shaping the text 'ฦ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦด' and shaping the text 'ฦด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบน' and shaping the text 'แบน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‹' and shaping the text 'แป‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แน…' and shaping the text 'แน…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฅ' and shaping the text 'แปฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แธฟ' and shaping the text 'แธฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วน' and shaping the text 'วน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Shaper didn't attach acutecomb to edieresis.sc when shaping the text 'ั‘ฬ' * be_Cyrl (Belarusian)
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล—' and shaping the text 'ล—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ•' and shaping the text 'ฤ•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฌ' and shaping the text 'รฌ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤญ' and shaping the text 'ฤญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล€' and shaping the text 'ล€' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลญ' and shaping the text 'ลญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษฒ' and shaping the text 'ษฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'a' and shaping the text 'a' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'b' and shaping the text 'b' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'd' and shaping the text 'd' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'e' and shaping the text 'e' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'f' and shaping the text 'f' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'g' and shaping the text 'g' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'h' and shaping the text 'h' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'i' and shaping the text 'i' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'j' and shaping the text 'j' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'k' and shaping the text 'k' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'l' and shaping the text 'l' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'm' and shaping the text 'm' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'n' and shaping the text 'n' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'p' and shaping the text 'p' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'q' and shaping the text 'q' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'r' and shaping the text 'r' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 't' and shaping the text 't' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'u' and shaping the text 'u' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'y' and shaping the text 'y' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฅ' and shaping the text 'รฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รค' and shaping the text 'รค' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รก' and shaping the text 'รก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ร ' and shaping the text 'ร ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤƒ' and shaping the text 'ฤƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รข' and shaping the text 'รข' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฃ' and shaping the text 'รฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ…' and shaping the text 'ฤ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฐ' and shaping the text 'รฐ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‘' and shaping the text 'ฤ‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฉ' and shaping the text 'รฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รจ' and shaping the text 'รจ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รช' and shaping the text 'รช' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ›' and shaping the text 'ฤ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รซ' and shaping the text 'รซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ—' and shaping the text 'ฤ—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ™' and shaping the text 'ฤ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ“' and shaping the text 'ฤ“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤŸ' and shaping the text 'ฤŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วง' and shaping the text 'วง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฃ' and shaping the text 'ฤฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฅ' and shaping the text 'วฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศŸ' and shaping the text 'ศŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤง' and shaping the text 'ฤง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รญ' and shaping the text 'รญ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฎ' and shaping the text 'รฎ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฏ' and shaping the text 'รฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฏ' and shaping the text 'ฤฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤซ' and shaping the text 'ฤซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤฑ' and shaping the text 'ฤฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฉ' and shaping the text 'วฉ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤท' and shaping the text 'ฤท' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤบ' and shaping the text 'ฤบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤพ' and shaping the text 'ฤพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤผ' and shaping the text 'ฤผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‚' and shaping the text 'ล‚' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล„' and shaping the text 'ล„' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลˆ' and shaping the text 'ลˆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฑ' and shaping the text 'รฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล†' and shaping the text 'ล†' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‹' and shaping the text 'ล‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล“' and shaping the text 'ล“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล•' and shaping the text 'ล•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล™' and shaping the text 'ล™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รŸ' and shaping the text 'รŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฅ' and shaping the text 'ลฅ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฃ' and shaping the text 'ลฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ›' and shaping the text 'ศ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลง' and shaping the text 'ลง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รบ' and shaping the text 'รบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รน' and shaping the text 'รน' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รป' and shaping the text 'รป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฏ' and shaping the text 'ลฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลฑ' and shaping the text 'ลฑ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลณ' and shaping the text 'ลณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลซ' and shaping the text 'ลซ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฝ' and shaping the text 'รฝ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฟ' and shaping the text 'รฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รผ' and shaping the text 'รผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ส’' and shaping the text 'ส’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฏ' and shaping the text 'วฏ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รพ' and shaping the text 'รพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฆ' and shaping the text 'รฆ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    Warning language shaping:

    Message Languages
    Small caps for Latin letters: * mt_Latn (Maltese)
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * da_Latn (Danish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'วฟ' and shaping the text 'วฟ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pt_Latn (Portuguese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * dyu_Latn (Dyula)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sq_Latn (Albanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fr_Latn (French)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hr_Latn (Croatian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * sr_Latn (Serbian (Latin))
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sv_Latn (Swedish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nl_Latn (Dutch)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * en_Latn (English)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Auxiliary orthography codepoints: * el_Grek (Greek)
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ€
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ…
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‡
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แพถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผ 
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผก
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ†
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฐ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผด
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผฑ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผต
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผณ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แผท
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝถ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ„
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‚
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝƒ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝธ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ”
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ’
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ–
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ‘
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ•
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ“
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝ—
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝบ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝค
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝข
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฆ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฅ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝฃ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝง
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฝผ
    The following auxiliary characters are missing from the font: แฟถ
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ha_Latn (Hausa)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * es_Latn (Spanish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * nb_Latn (Norwegian Bokmรฅl)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * pl_Latn (Polish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cs_Latn (Czech)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * bm_Latn (Bambara)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lt_Latn (Lithuanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fi_Latn (Finnish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‡' and shaping the text 'ฤ‡' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ‹' and shaping the text 'ฤ‹' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล›' and shaping the text 'ล›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลบ' and shaping the text 'ลบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลผ' and shaping the text 'ลผ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * de_Latn (German)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * cy_Latn (Welsh)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบƒ' and shaping the text 'แบƒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ' and shaping the text 'แบ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลต' and shaping the text 'ลต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แบ…' and shaping the text 'แบ…' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * tr_Latn (Turkish)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * hu_Latn (Hungarian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ig_Latn (Igbo)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษต' and shaping the text 'ษต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * yo_Latn (Yoruba)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แนฃ' and shaping the text 'แนฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ว’' and shaping the text 'ว’' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sk_Latn (Slovak)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล‘' and shaping the text 'ล‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ff_Latn (Fulah)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * it_Latn (Italian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * vi_Latn (Vietnamese)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รต' and shaping the text 'รต' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป“' and shaping the text 'แป“' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป•' and shaping the text 'แป•' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป—' and shaping the text 'แป—' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป‘' and shaping the text 'แป‘' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป™' and shaping the text 'แป™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฦก' and shaping the text 'ฦก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป' and shaping the text 'แป' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปŸ' and shaping the text 'แปŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปก' and shaping the text 'แปก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แป›' and shaping the text 'แป›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'แปฃ' and shaping the text 'แปฃ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lg_Latn (Ganda)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * om_Latn (Oromo)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * xh_Latn (Xhosa)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * zu_Latn (Zulu)
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * lv_Latn (Latvian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ฤ' and shaping the text 'ฤ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลก' and shaping the text 'ลก' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลพ' and shaping the text 'ลพ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * sw_Latn (Swahili)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * af_Latn (Afrikaans)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * is_Latn (Icelandic)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ro_Latn (Romanian)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ศ™' and shaping the text 'ศ™' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ลŸ' and shaping the text 'ลŸ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * fat_Latn (Fanti)
    When shaping the text 'ษ›' and shaping the text 'ษ›' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same * tw_akuapem_Latn (Akuapem Twi)
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ษ”' and shaping the text 'ษ”' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    Small caps for Latin letters: * ca_Latn (Catalan)
    When shaping the text 'c' and shaping the text 'c' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รง' and shaping the text 'รง' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'o' and shaping the text 'o' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รณ' and shaping the text 'รณ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รฒ' and shaping the text 'รฒ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 's' and shaping the text 's' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'v' and shaping the text 'v' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'w' and shaping the text 'w' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'x' and shaping the text 'x' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'z' and shaping the text 'z' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รด' and shaping the text 'รด' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รถ' and shaping the text 'รถ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'รธ' and shaping the text 'รธ' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    When shaping the text 'ล' and shaping the text 'ล' with features: smcp, the output is expected to be different, but was the same
    [code: warning-language-shaping]

Repository Checks

Directory name in GFonts repo structure must match NameID 1 of the regular.

Check ID: googlefonts/repo/dirname_matches_nameid_1
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Video') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansvideo'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Video SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansvideosc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Raster SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansrastersc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsanssc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Screen SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansscreensc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Screen') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansscreen'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Print SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansprintsc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsans'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Raster') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansraster'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Print') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsansprint'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Smooth SC') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsanssmoothsc'.

    [code: mismatch]
๐Ÿ”ฅ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ FAIL

    Family name on the name table ('Matrix Sans Smooth') does not match directory name in the repo structure ('ttf'). Expected 'matrixsanssmooth'.

    [code: mismatch]

Font File Checks

Checking OS/2 achVendID.

Check ID: googlefonts/vendor_id
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID is 'PfEd', a font editor default. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx

    [code: bad]

Shaping Checks

Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.

Check ID: soft_dotted
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideo-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansVideoSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ’

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRasterSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ†

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreenSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ“

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansScreen-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrintSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSans-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ†

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansRaster-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansPrint-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ€

    [code: soft-dotted]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings:

    • ั–ฬThe dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example:

    • ั–ฬŒ

    • ั–ฬ€

    • ั–ฬŠ

    • ั–ฬ

    • ั–ฬ’

    • ั–ฬƒ

    • ั–ฬ„

    • ั–ฬ“

    • ั–ฬ‡

    • ั–ฬ‚

    • ั–ฬ‹

    • ั–ฬ‰

    • ั–ฬ†

    • ั˜ฬŒ

    • ั˜ฬ€

    • ั˜ฬŠ

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ’

    • ั˜ฬƒ

    • ั˜ฬˆ

    • ั˜ฬ„

    • ั˜ฬ“

    • ั˜ฬ

    • ั˜ฬ‡

    • ั˜ฬ‚

    • ั˜ฬ‹

    • ั˜ฬ‰

    • ั˜ฬ†

    [code: soft-dotted]

Outline Checks

Check the direction of the outermost contour in each glyph

Check ID: outline_direction
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The following glyphs have a counter-clockwise outer contour:

    • uni03E0 (U+03E0) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    [code: ccw-outer-contour]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The following glyphs have a counter-clockwise outer contour:

    • uni03E0 (U+03E0) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    • uni03E1 (U+03E1) has a counter-clockwise outer contour
    [code: ccw-outer-contour]

Are any segments inordinately short?

Check ID: outline_short_segments
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmoothSC-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The following glyphs have short segments:

    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (380.0, 300.0), p1: (350.0, 300.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (250.0, 300.0), p1: (220.0, 300.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (220.0, 400.0), p1: (250.0, 400.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 400.0), p1: (380.0, 400.0) })
    • peseta (U+20A7) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (750.0, 170.0), p1: (750.0, 200.0) })
    • peseta (U+20A7) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (750.0, 330.0), p1: (750.0, 300.0) })
    • uniFB13 (U+FB13) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (850.0, 100.0), p1: (820.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB13 (U+FB13) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB14 (U+FB14) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (950.0, 100.0), p1: (920.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB14 (U+FB14) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB15 (U+FB15) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB15 (U+FB15) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (650.0, 400.0), p1: (680.0, 400.0) })
    • uniFB16 (U+FB16) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB16 (U+FB16) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (850.0, 100.0), p1: (820.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (220.0, 0.0), p1: (180.0, 0.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (920.0, 100.0), p1: (950.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (680.0, 400.0), p1: (650.0, 400.0) })
    [code: found-short-segments]
โš ๏ธ MatrixSansSmooth-Regular.ttf
  • โš ๏ธ WARN

    The following glyphs have short segments:

    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (380.0, 300.0), p1: (350.0, 300.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (250.0, 300.0), p1: (220.0, 300.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (220.0, 400.0), p1: (250.0, 400.0) })
    • uni0496 (U+0496) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 400.0), p1: (380.0, 400.0) })
    • peseta (U+20A7) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (750.0, 170.0), p1: (750.0, 200.0) })
    • peseta (U+20A7) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (750.0, 330.0), p1: (750.0, 300.0) })
    • uniFB13 (U+FB13) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (850.0, 100.0), p1: (820.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB13 (U+FB13) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB14 (U+FB14) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (950.0, 100.0), p1: (920.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB14 (U+FB14) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB15 (U+FB15) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB15 (U+FB15) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (650.0, 400.0), p1: (680.0, 400.0) })
    • uniFB16 (U+FB16) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB16 (U+FB16) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (850.0, 100.0), p1: (820.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (350.0, 100.0), p1: (320.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (220.0, 0.0), p1: (180.0, 0.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (920.0, 100.0), p1: (950.0, 100.0) })
    • uniFB17 (U+FB17) contains a short segment Line(Line { p0: (680.0, 400.0), p1: (650.0, 400.0) })
    [code: found-short-segments]